» Articles » PMID: 16945854

How Does Running Memory Span Work?

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2006 Sep 2
PMID 16945854
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In running memory span, a list ends unpredictably, and the last few items are to be recalled. This task is of increasing importance in recent research. We argue that there are two very different strategies for performing running span tasks: a low-effort strategy in which items are passively held until the list ends, when retrieval into a capacity-limited store takes place; and a higher-effort strategy in which working memory is continually updated using rehearsal processes during the list presentation. In two experiments, we examine the roles of these two strategies and the consequences of two types of interference.

Citing Articles

The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat-Recall Test.

Sun J, Zhang Z, Sun B, Liu H, Wei C, Liu Y Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:924193.

PMID: 35936762 PMC: 9354826. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.924193.


Working Memory Models and Measures in Language and Bilingualism Research: Integrating Cognitive and Affective Perspectives.

Edward Wen Z, Teng M, Han L, Zeng Y Brain Sci. 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35741614 PMC: 9221522. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060729.


Behavioural and ERP Effects of Cognitive and Combined Cognitive and Physical Training on Working Memory and Executive Function in Healthy Older Adults.

Chainay H, Joubert C, Massol S Adv Cogn Psychol. 2022; 17(1):58-69.

PMID: 35003404 PMC: 8720364. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0317-y.


Training and transfer effects of working memory updating training in male abstinent long-term methamphetamine users.

Zhao X, Wang L, Maes J Addict Behav Rep. 2021; 14:100385.

PMID: 34938843 PMC: 8664865. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100385.


Doubts About the Role of Rehearsal in the Irrelevant Sound Effect.

Samper J, Morrison A, Chein J Exp Psychol. 2021; 68(5):229-242.

PMID: 34911357 PMC: 9446469. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000527.


References
1.
Chen Z, Cowan N . Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 31(6):1235-49. PMC: 2673719. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1235. View

2.
Loftus G, Masson M . Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 1(4):476-90. DOI: 10.3758/BF03210951. View

3.
Ng H, Maybery M . Grouping in short-term memory: do oscillators code the positions of items?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(1):175-81. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.175. View

4.
Cowan N . The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x01003922. View

5.
Tulving E, PATKAU J . Concurrent effects of contextual constraint and word frequency on immediate recall and learning of verbal material. Can J Psychol. 1962; 16:83-95. DOI: 10.1037/h0083231. View