» Articles » PMID: 16927202

Synergy Between the Light-induced Acute Response and the Circadian Cycle: a New Mechanism for the Synchronization of the Phaseolus Vulgaris Clock to Light

Overview
Journal Plant Mol Biol
Date 2006 Aug 24
PMID 16927202
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PvLHY and Lhcb expression has been studied in primary bean leaves after exposure of etiolated leaves to two or three white light-pulses and under different photoperiods. Under the tested photoperiods, the steady-state mRNA levels exhibit diurnal oscillations with zenith in the morning between ZT21 and 4 for PvLHY and between ZT4 and 6 for Lhcb. Nadir is in the evening between ZT12 and 18 for PvLHY and ZT18 and 24 for Lhcb. Light-pulses to etiolated seedlings induce a differentiated acute response that is reciprocally correlated with the amplitude of the following circadian cycle. In addition, the clock modulates the duration of the acute response (descending part of the curve included), which according to the phase of the rhythm at light application extends from 7 to 18 h. This constitutes the response dynamics of the Phaseolus clock to light. Similarly, the waveform of PvLHY and Lhcb expression during the day of different photoperiods resembles in induction capability (accomplishment of peak after lights-on) and duration (from lights-on phase to trough) the phase-dependent progression of acute response in etiolated seedlings. Consequently, the peak of Lhcb (all tested photoperiods) and PvLHY (in LD 18:6) attained in the photophase corresponds to the acute response peak, while the peak of PvLHY during the scotophase (in LD 12:12 and 6:18) corresponds to the circadian peak. Thus, the effect of the response dynamics in the photoperiod determines the coincidence of the peak with the photo- or scotophase, respectively. This represents a new model mechanism for the adaptation of the Phaseolus clock to light.

Citing Articles

Circadian Rhythms in Legumes: What Do We Know and What Else Should We Explore?.

Kugan H, Rejab N, Sahruzaini N, Harikrishna J, Baisakh N, Cheng A Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(9).

PMID: 33925559 PMC: 8123782. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094588.


DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock.

Liew L, Hecht V, Laurie R, Knowles C, Vander Schoor J, Macknight R Plant Cell. 2009; 21(10):3198-211.

PMID: 19843842 PMC: 2782296. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.067223.

References
1.
Alabadi D, Yanovsky M, Mas P, Harmer S, Kay S . Critical role for CCA1 and LHY in maintaining circadian rhythmicity in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2002; 12(9):757-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00815-1. View

2.
Harmer S, Panda S, Kay S . Molecular bases of circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001; 17:215-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.215. View

3.
Harmer S, Hogenesch J, Straume M, Chang H, Han B, Zhu T . Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Science. 2000; 290(5499):2110-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5499.2110. View

4.
Mizoguchi T, Wheatley K, Hanzawa Y, Wright L, Mizoguchi M, Song H . LHY and CCA1 are partially redundant genes required to maintain circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2002; 2(5):629-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00170-3. View

5.
Wehmeyer B, Cashmore A, Schafer E . Photocontrol of the Expression of Genes Encoding Chlorophyll a/b Binding Proteins and Small Subunit of Ribulose-1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase in Etiolated Seedlings of Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) and Nicotiana tabacum (L.). Plant Physiol. 1990; 93(3):990-7. PMC: 1062619. DOI: 10.1104/pp.93.3.990. View