» Articles » PMID: 16905061

Soft-tissue and Cortical-bone Thickness at Orthodontic Implant Sites

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2006 Aug 15
PMID 16905061
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: To obtain sufficient stability of implants, the thickness of the soft tissue and the cortical bone in the placement site must be considered. However, the literature contains few anatomical studies of orthodontic implants.

Methods: To measure soft-tissue and cortical-bone thicknesses, maxillae from 23 Korean cadavers were decalcified, and buccopalatal cross-sectional specimens were obtained. These specimens were made at 3 maxillary midpalatal suture areas: the interdental area between the first and second premolars (group 1), the interdental area between the second premolar and the first molar (group 2), and the interdental area between the first and second molars (group 3).

Results: In all groups, buccal soft tissues were thickest closest to and farthest from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and thinnest in the middle. Palatal soft-tissue thickness increased gradually from the CEJ toward the apical region in all groups. Buccal cortical-bone was thickest closest to and farthest from the CEJ and thinnest in the middle in groups 1 and 2. Palatal cortical-bone thickness was greatest 6 mm apical to the CEJ in groups 1 and 3, and 2 mm apical to the CEJ in group 2. Along the midpalatal suture, palatal mucosa remained uniformly 1 mm thick posterior to the incisive papilla.

Conclusions: Surgical placement of miniscrew implants for orthodontic anchorage in the maxillary molar region requires consideration of the placement site and angle based on anatomical characteristics.

Citing Articles

Is simultaneous placement of orthodontic mini-implants and skeletally anchored appliances advisable? : CBCT-based cadaver study comparing the accuracy of the digital workflow with methods requiring two visits.

Augustinowitz T, Schiavon L, Mucke K, Schwarz-Herzke B, Drescher D, Brunello G J Orofac Orthop. 2025; .

PMID: 40035866 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-025-00578-x.


Mapping optimal orthodontic implant sites in the palate using cone-beam computed tomography.

Zhu Z, Zhong L, Zhao Y, Wang X, Qian W, Ye N Front Oral Health. 2024; 5:1453665.

PMID: 39416888 PMC: 11480054. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2024.1453665.


Evaluation of Maxillary Protraction Using a Mini Screw-Retained Palatal C-Shaped Plate and Face Mask.

Elsaharty M, Ghobashi S, El-Shorbagy E Turk J Orthod. 2024; 37(3):146-152.

PMID: 39344854 PMC: 11589173. DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.63.


Evaluating palatal mucosal thickness in orthodontic miniscrew sites using cone-beam computed tomography.

Burak K, Hilmi B BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1153.

PMID: 39343869 PMC: 11439259. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04935-x.


Evaluation of bone thickness at infra-zygomatic crest region compared with cervical vertebrae maturation index.

Baghel S, Kujur A, Gopal B, Kumari J, Gupta A, Singh V Bioinformation. 2024; 20(6):630-633.

PMID: 39131532 PMC: 11312314. DOI: 10.6026/973206300200630.