Understanding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decision Making: Perspectives of Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Family Members
Overview
Affiliations
Background: To improve communication and decision making related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a greater understanding of the perspectives of hospitalized patients with advanced diseases and their family members are needed.
Methods: In five Canadian hospitals, we administered a face-to-face questionnaire to older inpatients with end-stage cancer and advanced medical diseases and, where possible, to one of their family members, regarding information needs, the deliberation process, and their preferred decisional role.
Findings: A total of 440 of 569 patients (78%) and 160 of 176 available caregivers (91%) agreed to participate. Most patients (61%) had thought about what treatment they wanted if their heart stopped, few patients (11.3%) could describe more than two components of CPR, and only 2.7% of patients thought that the success rate of CPR was < 10%. A minority of patients (34%) had discussed CPR with their physician; 37% did not want to discuss their preferences with their doctor. Patients who felt that end-of-life issues were relevant to them were 5.5 times more likely to want a discussion with the physician regarding resuscitation (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 12.0). The preferred role in decision making was variable, but most patients (59.7%) and family members (81.6%) preferred some degree of shared decision making that included the family member. There were no significant differences between cancer and medical patients in their preferred decisional role.
Interpretation: Seriously ill hospitalized patients have poor knowledge about CPR, and variable preferences for deliberation and their role in the decision-making process regarding their treatment. Strategies that improve understanding of CPR and foster discussions that involve patients, family members, and physicians in the decision-making process may improve the quantity and quality of communication and decision making about CPR.
Popov V, Harmer B, Raphael S, Scott I, Sample A, Cooke J Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2470976.
PMID: 40028867 PMC: 11878170. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2470976.
Joshi C, Malik S, Wang W, Ouchi K J Gen Intern Med. 2024; .
PMID: 39663339 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09243-2.
Liu W, Zhang L, Djamasbi S, Tulu B, Muehlschlegel S Neurotherapeutics. 2024; 22(1):e00503.
PMID: 39643583 PMC: 11840347. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00503.
Meier C, Vilpert S, Wieczorek M, Borasio G, Jox R, Maurer J Med Decis Making. 2023; 44(2):129-134.
PMID: 38156651 PMC: 10865767. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231218691.
Predictors of Documented Goals-of-Care Discussion for Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Illness.
Uyeda A, Lee R, Pollack L, Paul S, Downey L, Brumback L J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022; 65(3):233-241.
PMID: 36423800 PMC: 9928787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.012.