» Articles » PMID: 16899840

Understanding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decision Making: Perspectives of Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Family Members

Overview
Journal Chest
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2006 Aug 11
PMID 16899840
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To improve communication and decision making related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a greater understanding of the perspectives of hospitalized patients with advanced diseases and their family members are needed.

Methods: In five Canadian hospitals, we administered a face-to-face questionnaire to older inpatients with end-stage cancer and advanced medical diseases and, where possible, to one of their family members, regarding information needs, the deliberation process, and their preferred decisional role.

Findings: A total of 440 of 569 patients (78%) and 160 of 176 available caregivers (91%) agreed to participate. Most patients (61%) had thought about what treatment they wanted if their heart stopped, few patients (11.3%) could describe more than two components of CPR, and only 2.7% of patients thought that the success rate of CPR was < 10%. A minority of patients (34%) had discussed CPR with their physician; 37% did not want to discuss their preferences with their doctor. Patients who felt that end-of-life issues were relevant to them were 5.5 times more likely to want a discussion with the physician regarding resuscitation (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 12.0). The preferred role in decision making was variable, but most patients (59.7%) and family members (81.6%) preferred some degree of shared decision making that included the family member. There were no significant differences between cancer and medical patients in their preferred decisional role.

Interpretation: Seriously ill hospitalized patients have poor knowledge about CPR, and variable preferences for deliberation and their role in the decision-making process regarding their treatment. Strategies that improve understanding of CPR and foster discussions that involve patients, family members, and physicians in the decision-making process may improve the quantity and quality of communication and decision making about CPR.

Citing Articles

Elucidating cognitive processes in cardiac arrest team leaders: a virtual reality-based cued-recall study of experts and novices.

Popov V, Harmer B, Raphael S, Scott I, Sample A, Cooke J Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2470976.

PMID: 40028867 PMC: 11878170. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2470976.


Patient Preferences for Code Status Discussions: A Randomized Trial of Information- vs. Patient Values-Centered Frameworks.

Joshi C, Malik S, Wang W, Ouchi K J Gen Intern Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39663339 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-09243-2.


Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.

Liu W, Zhang L, Djamasbi S, Tulu B, Muehlschlegel S Neurotherapeutics. 2024; 22(1):e00503.

PMID: 39643583 PMC: 11840347. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00503.


Overestimation of Survival Rates of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated with Higher Preferences to Be Resuscitated: Evidence from a National Survey of Older Adults in Switzerland.

Meier C, Vilpert S, Wieczorek M, Borasio G, Jox R, Maurer J Med Decis Making. 2023; 44(2):129-134.

PMID: 38156651 PMC: 10865767. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231218691.


Predictors of Documented Goals-of-Care Discussion for Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Illness.

Uyeda A, Lee R, Pollack L, Paul S, Downey L, Brumback L J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022; 65(3):233-241.

PMID: 36423800 PMC: 9928787. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.012.