» Articles » PMID: 16897295

Assessing the Contamination Potential of Freshly Extracted Escherichia Coli Biofilm Cells by Impedancemetry

Overview
Journal Microb Ecol
Date 2006 Aug 10
PMID 16897295
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Planktonic bacteria passing to a sessile state during the formation of a biofilm undergo many gene expression and phenotypic changes. These transformations require a significant time to establish. Inversely, cells extracted from a biofilm should also require a significant time before acquiring the same physiological characteristics as planktonic cells. Relatively few studies have addressed the kinetics of this inverse transformation process. We tested one aspect, namely, the contamination potential of freshly extracted Escherichia coli biofilm cells, precultured in a synthetic medium, in a rich liquid growth medium. We compared the time between inoculation and the beginning of the growth phase of freshly extracted biofilm cells, and suspended exponential and suspended stationary phase cells precultured in the same synthetic medium. Unexpectedly, the lag time for the extracted biofilm cells was the same as the lag time of the suspended exponential phase cells and significantly less than the lag time of the suspended stationary phase cells. The lag times were determined by an impedance technique. Cells extracted from biofilms, i.e., biofilms formed in canalizations and broken up by hydrodynamic forces, are an important source of contamination. Our work shows, in the case of E. coli, the high potential of freshly extracted biofilm cells to reinfect a new medium.

Citing Articles

[The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].

Scheuermann-Poley C, Wagner C, Hoffmann J, Moter A, Willy C Unfallchirurg. 2017; 120(6):461-471.

PMID: 28540567 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-017-0361-y.

References
1.
Rice A, Hamilton M, Camper A . Apparent surface associated lag time in growth of primary biofilm cells. Microb Ecol. 2000; 40(1):8-15. DOI: 10.1007/s002480000011. View

2.
Shigeta M, Komatsuzawa H, Sugai M, Suginaka H, Usui T . Effect of the growth rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on the susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Chemotherapy. 1997; 43(2):137-41. DOI: 10.1159/000239548. View

3.
Gilbert P, Collier P, Brown M . Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990; 34(10):1865-8. PMC: 171955. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.10.1865. View

4.
Telgmann U, Horn H, Morgenroth E . Influence of growth history on sloughing and erosion from biofilms. Water Res. 2004; 38(17):3671-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.020. View

5.
Van Houdt R, Michiels C . Role of bacterial cell surface structures in Escherichia coli biofilm formation. Res Microbiol. 2005; 156(5-6):626-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.02.005. View