» Articles » PMID: 16882049

Stenting Versus Non-stenting After Non-complicated Ureteroscopic Manipulation of Stones in Bilharzial Ureters

Overview
Journal Int J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2006 Aug 3
PMID 16882049
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Stents were used routinely after ureteroscopy to prevent postoperative ureteral obstruction. However, because of the recognized complications of stents, non-stenting is the new trend after uncomplicated ureteroscopy. The wall of the bilharzial ureter is characteristically thick and may be calcified. The aim of this study is to see if the non-stenting trend could be applied to ureteroscopic manipulation of stones in bilharzial ureters.

Patients And Methods: In this prospective study, 56 patients, with evidence of bilharzial lesions in the urinary tract, undergoing ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones were included. After successful uncomplicated stone fragmentation and extraction, patients were randomized into two groups. Group A includes 28 patients in whom double J 6-Fr polyurethane stents were placed for 3 weeks. Group B includes 28 non-stented patients. Postoperative fever, loin pain, lower urinary tract symptoms and change in the degree of hydronephrosis were reported.

Results: There was no significant difference in the mean age of patients and stone size in both groups. The mean operative time was 43 +/- 14 min in group A and 38 +/- 11 in group B. There was no significant difference in the mean loin pain score, in the first postoperative 48 h, in both groups (4.4 +/- 0.8 in group A and 4.9 +/- 0.5 in group B). Patients in group A had, significantly, more flank pain with voiding (P < 0.01), voiding pain (P = 0.04), frequency (P = 0.01) and urgency (P = 0.04). Radiologic follow-up was available for 24 patients in group A and 23 patients in group B at the 3-month visit. Hydronephrosis had improved in all patients, in both groups, with no evidence of ureteral stricture.

Conclusion: Routine placement of stents after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for distal ureteral stones is unnecessary in bilharzial ureters. Moreover, it might be unadvisable because lower urinary tract symptoms and voiding loin pain are more in patients with ureteral stents and hydronephrosis is equally improved in stented and non-stented patients.

Citing Articles

Optimizing the outcome of non-pre-stented flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy regarding the quality of life, when to remove the stent?.

Fu Z, Xie H, Huang J, Zhu F, Gao H, Liu C BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):174.

PMID: 39169348 PMC: 11337566. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01561-1.


Reprint - Ureteral stent vs. no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi: A Cochrane review.

Ordonez M, Hwang E, Borofsky M, Bakker C, Gandhi S, Dahm P Can Urol Assoc J. 2019; 14(2):61-68.

PMID: 31348748 PMC: 7012284. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5957.


Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.

Ordonez M, Hwang E, Borofsky M, Bakker C, Gandhi S, Dahm P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2:CD012703.

PMID: 30726554 PMC: 6365118. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012703.pub2.


A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal.

Seklehner S, Sievert K, Lee R, Engelhardt P, Riedl C, Kunit T Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49(5):753-761.

PMID: 28197765 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1538-6.


Meta-Analysis of Stenting versus Non-Stenting for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones.

Wang H, Man L, Li G, Huang G, Liu N, Wang J PLoS One. 2017; 12(1):e0167670.

PMID: 28068364 PMC: 5221881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167670.