» Articles » PMID: 16880921

Inductive Tissue Engineering with Protein and DNA-releasing Scaffolds

Overview
Journal Mol Biosyst
Date 2006 Aug 2
PMID 16880921
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cellular differentiation, organization, proliferation and apoptosis are determined by a combination of an intrinsic genetic program, matrix/substrate interactions, and extracellular cues received from the local microenvironment. These molecular cues come in the form of soluble (e.g. cytokines) and insoluble (e.g. ECM proteins) factors, as well as signals from surrounding cells that can promote specific cellular processes leading to tissue formation or regeneration. Recent developments in the field of tissue engineering have employed biomaterials to present these cues, providing powerful tools to investigate the cellular processes involved in tissue development, or to devise therapeutic strategies based on cell replacement or tissue regeneration. These inductive scaffolds utilize natural and/or synthetic biomaterials fabricated into three-dimensional structures. This review summarizes the use of scaffolds in the dual role of structural support for cell growth and vehicle for controlled release of tissue inductive factors, or DNA encoding for these factors. The confluence of molecular and cell biology, materials science and engineering provides the tools to create controllable microenvironments that mimic natural developmental processes and direct tissue formation for experimental and therapeutic applications.

Citing Articles

Structural DNA nanotechnology at the nexus of next-generation bio-applications: challenges and perspectives.

Kosara S, Singh R, Bhatia D Nanoscale Adv. 2024; 6(2):386-401.

PMID: 38235105 PMC: 10790967. DOI: 10.1039/d3na00692a.


The biological applications of DNA nanomaterials: current challenges and future directions.

Ma W, Zhan Y, Zhang Y, Mao C, Xie X, Lin Y Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021; 6(1):351.

PMID: 34620843 PMC: 8497566. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-021-00727-9.


Bridging the lesion-engineering a permissive substrate for nerve regeneration.

Pires L, Pego A Regen Biomater. 2016; 2(3):203-14.

PMID: 26816642 PMC: 4669012. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbv012.


Gene delivery strategies to promote spinal cord repair.

Walthers C, Seidlits S Biomark Insights. 2015; 10(Suppl 1):11-29.

PMID: 25922572 PMC: 4395076. DOI: 10.4137/BMI.S20063.


Constraining the Pluripotent Fate of Human Embryonic Stem Cells for Tissue Engineering and Cell Therapy - The Turning Point of Cell-Based Regenerative Medicine.

Parsons X Br Biotechnol J. 2014; 3(4):424-457.

PMID: 24926434 PMC: 4051304. DOI: 10.9734/BBJ/2013/4309#sthash.6D8Rulbv.dpuf.


References
1.
Murphy W, Mooney D . Controlled delivery of inductive proteins, plasmid DNA and cells from tissue engineering matrices. J Periodontal Res. 2000; 34(7):413-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1999.tb02275.x. View

2.
Saltzman W, Mak M, Mahoney M, Duenas E, Cleland J . Intracranial delivery of recombinant nerve growth factor: release kinetics and protein distribution for three delivery systems. Pharm Res. 1999; 16(2):232-40. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018824324275. View

3.
Franco C, Brandberg J, Lonn L, Andersson B, Bengtsson B, Johannsson G . Growth hormone treatment reduces abdominal visceral fat in postmenopausal women with abdominal obesity: a 12-month placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 90(3):1466-74. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-1657. View

4.
Prelle K, Wobus A, Krebs O, Blum W, Wolf E . Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor-II in mouse embryonic stem cells promotes myogenic differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 277(3):631-8. DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3737. View

5.
Abbott A . Cell culture: biology's new dimension. Nature. 2003; 424(6951):870-2. DOI: 10.1038/424870a. View