» Articles » PMID: 16874865

Computed Tomographic Differentiation Between Alcoholic and Gallstone Pancreatitis: Significance of Distribution of Infiltration or Fluid Collection

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Jul 29
PMID 16874865
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of various computed tomography (CT) findings including distribution of infiltration or fluid collection in differentiating the major etiologies of acute pancreatitis.

Methods: We reviewed 75 relatively severe cases of acute pancreatitis of alcoholic (n = 43) or biliary stone (n = 32) etiology having infiltration or fluid collection on CT. We compared the pancreatic size, CT grading, presence or absence of biliary calculi, and dilatation of pancreatic or bile duct. We also evaluated degree and the distribution of infiltration and fluid collection in each group.

Results: The sizes of pancreas were not different between alcohol group and stone group. Alcohol group showed higher CT grading than stone group (P < 0.05). Presence of biliary stone and duct dilatation was statistically significant in differentiating etiology (P < 0.05). Alcohol group showed significantly prominent peripancreatic pathology than stone group only in left peritoneal compartment (P = 0.020).

Conclusion: Alcoholic pancreatitis tends to form more prominent peripancreatic changes than gallstone pancreatitis in relatively severe cases. This is evident on the anterior aspect of left abdomen. Although clinical history and some CT findings usually are a major determinant of the etiology, this pattern of peripancreatic pathology may have an ancillary role in determining the etiologies of acute pancreatitis in the equivocal cases.

Citing Articles

Computed tomography characteristics of acute pancreatitis based on different etiologies at different onset times: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Du J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Jiang R, Fu Q, Yang G Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(9):4448-4461.

PMID: 36060601 PMC: 9403572. DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-1231.


Comparative study of the outcome between alcohol and gallstone pancreatitis in a high-volume tertiary care center.

Samanta J, Dhaka N, Gupta P, Singh A, Yadav T, Gupta V JGH Open. 2019; 3(4):338-343.

PMID: 31406928 PMC: 6684514. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12169.


Analysis of Factors Associated with the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis according to Etiology.

Kim D, Chung W, Lee J, Lee K, Oh J, Jeon E Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018; 2017:1219464.

PMID: 29362560 PMC: 5738578. DOI: 10.1155/2017/1219464.


Comparison of clinical course and outcome of acute pancreatitis according to the two main etiologies: alcohol and gallstone.

Cho J, Kim T, Kim S BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 15:87.

PMID: 26209440 PMC: 4513750. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-015-0323-1.

References
1.
Siegelman S, Copeland B, Saba G, Cameron J, Sanders R, Zerhouni E . CT of fluid collections associated with pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980; 134(6):1121-32. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.134.6.1121. View

2.
Balthazar E, Ranson J, Naidich D, Megibow A, Caccavale R, Cooper M . Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology. 1985; 156(3):767-72. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.156.3.4023241. View

3.
Neoptolemos J, Carr-Locke D, London N, Bailey I, James D, Fossard D . Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet. 1988; 2(8618):979-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90740-4. View

4.
Balthazar E, Robinson D, Megibow A, Ranson J . Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990; 174(2):331-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296641. View

5.
Scholmerich J, Johannesson T, Brobmann G, Wimmer B, Thiedemann B, Gross V . [Sonography in acute pancreatitis--diagnosis, assessment of etiology and evaluating prognosis]. Ultraschall Med. 1989; 10(6):290-4. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1006010. View