» Articles » PMID: 16870821

Outcome and Structural Integrity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using 2 Rows of Fixation: Minimum 2-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 Jul 28
PMID 16870821
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff are becoming increasingly popular, security of fixation remains a concern. Two-row repairs have been described, but clinical outcome reports have primarily involved open techniques.

Hypothesis: An arthroscopic repair technique that uses 2 rows of fixation produces satisfactory outcome and structural integrity by ultrasonography.

Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Forty-eight patients (52 shoulders) with a full-thickness, but fully reducible, rotator cuff tear who met the inclusion criteria were treated with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of suture anchors. The mean tear size was 2.47 cm (range, 1-4 cm). Patients were evaluated by subjective functional assessment (L'Insalata Shoulder Rating Questionnaire), clinical examination, including measured strength testing, and ultrasonography.

Results: At a mean follow-up of 30 months (minimum of 2 years), functional scores improved from a mean of 42 preoperatively to 93 postoperatively (P < .001). Active range of motion was increased in all measured planes (P < .001). Strength was also increased in elevation (P < .001), external rotation (P < .001), and internal rotation (P = .033). Nine of the 52 shoulders (17%) had evidence of retear or persistent defect on postoperative ultrasonography. There were no differences detected in functional scores between those with an intact repair and those with a defect, but those with an intact repair were stronger in elevation (P = .006) and external rotation (P = .001).

Conclusion: An arthroscopic 2-row rotator cuff repair produces excellent functional outcome and repair integrity comparable with previously reported open repairs. Presence of a defect after repair did not appear to affect patient-reported function and return to preinjury activity but did affect measured strength.

Citing Articles

Functional Improvements by Controlled Suture Tension in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Imai S JB JS Open Access. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39850617 PMC: 11749655. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00031.


Arthroscopic cuff repair: footprint remnant preserving versus debriding rotator cuff repair of transtendinous rotator cuff tears with remnant cuff.

Lee J, Ji J, Park S, Suh D, Song K BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):302.

PMID: 38632573 PMC: 11022446. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07431-z.


Functional and Radiologic Outcomes of Degenerative Versus Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Supraspinatus Tendon.

Muller S, Muller A, Rosso C, Fankhauser L, Willscheid G, Akgun D Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(2):441-450.

PMID: 38259113 PMC: 10838469. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231219253.


Rotator cuff repair and return to sports practice in athletes older than 35 years: Is it possible? A systematic review.

Noffs G, Costa L Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 144(2):801-806.

PMID: 37787909 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05086-4.


Preoperative factors affecting the quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study.

Reddy B, Pandey V JSES Int. 2023; 7(5):805-811.

PMID: 37719822 PMC: 10499871. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.010.