» Articles » PMID: 16870275

A Comparison of Physiological and Behavioural Parameters in C57BL/6J Mice Undergoing Food or Water Restriction Regimes

Overview
Journal Behav Brain Res
Date 2006 Jul 28
PMID 16870275
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laboratory animals, when subjected to behavioural tests, are often motivationally primed by a period of prior water or food restriction. To date, it is still debatable which restriction protocol (water versus food) is more appropriate for different species. In general, a protocol is considered appropriate if animal discomfort is kept to a minimum whilst motivation for the task is maximised. Here we present a comparison study of the effects of water versus food restriction protocols in mice. The characterisation of the physiological and behavioural effects of food and water restriction in mice is beneficial for both institutional animal care centres and the scientific community. We have investigated body weight fluctuations in three groups of C57BL/6J female mice (water-restricted, food-restricted and control) in two different protocols (20 h versus 22 h of restriction per day) over 2 consecutive weeks. Subsequently, a selected number of mice from each group were subjected to a battery of behavioural tests to investigate exploratory, emotional and dominance behaviours, in addition to learning and memory processes. Body weight fluctuations suggested that mice tolerate a water restriction regimen better than a comparable food restriction regimen. Furthermore, behavioural performances demonstrated that food-restricted mice show a reduction in the exploration of a new environment and particular aspects of their timing memories are distorted. Finally, both water- and food-restricted mice tended to be more offensive than control mice when paired with an opponent in a social dominance test condition.

Citing Articles

Non-canonical metabolic and molecular effects of calorie restriction are revealed by varying temporal conditions.

Pak H, Grossberg A, Sanderfoot R, Babygirija R, Green C, Koller M Cell Rep. 2024; 43(9):114663.

PMID: 39167490 PMC: 11427179. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114663.


Holographic stimulation of opposing amygdala ensembles bidirectionally modulates valence-specific behavior via mutual inhibition.

Piantadosi S, Zhou Z, Pizzano C, Pedersen C, Nguyen T, Thai S Neuron. 2023; 112(4):593-610.e5.

PMID: 38086375 PMC: 10984369. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.11.007.


A novel task to investigate vibrotactile detection in mice.

Muller M, Pennartz C, Bosman C, Olcese U PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284735.

PMID: 37079581 PMC: 10118142. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284735.


Corticospinal neurons from motor and somatosensory cortices exhibit different temporal activity dynamics during motor learning.

Macias M, Lopez-Virgen V, Olivares-Moreno R, Rojas-Piloni G Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:1043501.

PMID: 36504625 PMC: 9732016. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1043501.


Prefrontal Dopaminergic Regulation of Cue-Guided Risky Decision-Making Performance in Rats.

Yang M, Fu Q, Ma C, Li B Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:934834.

PMID: 35898651 PMC: 9309612. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.934834.