[18F]fluorocholine PET/CT Imaging for the Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer at PSA Relapse: Experience in 100 Consecutive Patients
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: We evaluated the potential of PET/CT and [(18)F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) in the assessment of suspected recurrence of prostate cancer after treatment.
Methods: One hundred consecutive prostate cancer patients with a persistent increase in serum PSA (>0.1 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy (58 cases), radiotherapy (21 cases) or hormonal therapy alone (21 cases) were investigated. After injection of 3.7-4.07 MBq/kg of FCH, both early (at <15 min) and delayed (at >60 min) PET/CT scans were performed in 43 patients, delayed PET/CT scans in 53 patients and early PET/CT scans in four patients.
Results: Of the 100 patients, 54 (PSA 0.22-511.79 ng/ml) showed positive FCH PET/CT scans. Thirty-seven patients had bone and/or abdominal lymph node uptake, while 17 showed pelvic activity. Malignant disease was confirmed in all but one. Delayed SUV(max) of bone metastases was significantly higher (p<0.0001 by paired t test) than that measured at <15 min, whereas no differences were observed between early and delayed SUVs of malignant lymph nodes or pelvic disease. Forty-six patients (PSA 0.12-14.3 ng/ml) showed negative FCH PET/CT scans. Of the negative PET/CT scans, 89% were obtained in patients with serum PSA <4 ng/ml and 87% in patients with a Gleason score <8. In none of these cases could recurrent tumour be proven clinically during a follow-up of 6 months.
Conclusion: FCH PET/CT is not likely to have a significant impact on the care of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence until PSA increases to above 4 ng/ml. However, in selected patients, FCH PET/CT helps to exclude distant metastases when salvage local treatment is intended.
Echeverria C, Oyarzun V, Lopez-Cortes A, Cancino J, Sotomayor P, Goncalves M Prostate. 2023; 84(1):8-24.
PMID: 37888416 PMC: 10872645. DOI: 10.1002/pros.24631.
Oprea-Lager D, Gontier E, Garcia-Canamaque L, Gauthe M, Olivier P, Mitjavila M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 50(11):3439-3451.
PMID: 37341747 PMC: 10542307. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06301-5.
Jaswal A, Hazari P, Prakash S, Sethi P, Kaushik A, Roy B ACS Omega. 2022; 7(15):12509-12523.
PMID: 35474820 PMC: 9025991. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04256.
The Need to Pair Molecular Monitoring Devices with Molecular Imaging to Personalize Health.
Comeau Z, Lessard B, Shuhendler A Mol Imaging Biol. 2022; 24(5):675-691.
PMID: 35257276 PMC: 8901094. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01714-4.
Molecular Mechanisms Related with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer-Is It Just a Matter of Numbers?.
Surcel C, Kretschmer A, Mirvald C, Sinescu I, Heidegger I, Tsaur I Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(3).
PMID: 35159033 PMC: 8833728. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030766.