» Articles » PMID: 16865309

Age As a Predicting Factor in the Therapy Outcome of Multidisciplinary Treatment of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain--a Prospective Longitudinal Clinical Study in 405 Patients

Overview
Journal Clin Rheumatol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2006 Jul 26
PMID 16865309
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective longitudinal clinical study evaluates the prognostic value of age in the therapy outcome of patients with chronic low back pain treated with a multidisciplinary therapy. Four hundred five patients with chronic low back pain for 3 months or longer and a corresponding sick leave for longer than 6 weeks underwent a 3-week standardized multidisciplinary therapy. Patients were assigned into three groups of age with comparable baseline values at T0. At the 6-month follow-up (T1) five different therapy outcomes were analysed and compared in the three groups: back-to-work status, generic health status (SF36), pain intensity, functional capacity, and satisfaction with the therapy. All three treatment groups improved significantly in all outcome criteria between T0 and T1 except of functional capacity, which did not improve in the older patients. In the total group, the back-to-work rate was 61.7%. At the final follow-up, there were significantly better results in terms of functional capacity and pain level in younger patients, whereas back-to-work rate and satisfaction with therapy did not show a significant difference between the groups analysed. According to the results of this study, older patients with chronic low back pain also derive significant benefit from a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, although in some outcome criteria results were inferior to those obtained in younger patients.

Citing Articles

Development and application of predictive clinical biomarkers for low back pain care: recommendations from the ISSLS phenotype/precision spine focus group.

Hodges P, Sowa G, ONeill C, Vo N, Foster N, Samartzis D Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39964488 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08720-4.


Predictors of response following standardized education and self-management recommendations for low back pain stratified by dominant pain location.

Perruccio A, Wong J, Badley E, Power J, Yip C, Rampersaud Y N Am Spine Soc J. 2022; 8:100092.

PMID: 35141656 PMC: 8820018. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100092.


Pain coping strategies and their association with quality of life in people with Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional study.

Prell T, Liebermann J, Mendorf S, Lehmann T, Zipprich H PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0257966.

PMID: 34723975 PMC: 8559924. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257966.


Early Changes in Pain Acceptance Predict Pain Outcomes in Interdisciplinary Treatment for Chronic Pain.

Probst T, Jank R, Dreyer N, Seel S, Wagner R, Hanshans K J Clin Med. 2019; 8(9).

PMID: 31480798 PMC: 6780633. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091373.


Pharmacotherapies in Geriatric Chronic Pain Management.

Marcum Z, Duncan N, Makris U Clin Geriatr Med. 2016; 32(4):705-724.

PMID: 27741965 PMC: 5123672. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2016.06.007.


References
1.
Hildebrandt J, Pfingsten M, Saur P, Jansen J . Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(9):990-1001. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00011. View

2.
Kellgren J, Lawrence J . Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16(4):494-502. PMC: 1006995. DOI: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. View

3.
Main C . The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res. 1983; 27(6):503-14. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(83)90040-5. View

4.
van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C . Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002; 16(5):761-75. DOI: 10.1053/berh.2002.0267. View

5.
Gallagher R, Rauh V, Haugh L, Milhous R, Callas P, Langelier R . Determinants of return-to-work among low back pain patients. Pain. 1989; 39(1):55-67. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90175-9. View