» Articles » PMID: 16862405

Pediatric Interventional Radiography Equipment: Safety Considerations

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2006 Jul 25
PMID 16862405
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper discusses pediatric image quality and radiation dose considerations in state-of-the-art fluoroscopic imaging equipment. Although most fluoroscopes are capable of automatically providing good image quality on infants, toddlers, and small children, excessive radiation dose levels can result from design deficiencies of the imaging device or inappropriate configuration of the equipment's capabilities when imaging small body parts. Important design features and setup choices at installation and during the clinical use of the imaging device can improve image quality and reduce radiation exposure levels in pediatric patients. Pediatric radiologists and cardiologists, with the help of medical physicists, need to understand the issues involved in creating good image quality at reasonable pediatric patient doses. The control of radiographic technique factors by the generator of the imaging device must provide a large dynamic range of mAs values per exposure pulse during both fluoroscopy and image recording as a function of patient girth, which is the thickness of the patient in the posterior-anterior projection at the umbilicus (less than 10 cm to greater than 30 cm). The range of pulse widths must be limited to less than 10 ms in children to properly freeze patient motion. Variable rate pulsed fluoroscopy can be leveraged to reduce radiation dose to the patient and improve image quality. Three focal spots with nominal sizes of 0.3 mm to 1 mm are necessary on the pediatric unit. A second, lateral imaging plane might be necessary because of the child's limited tolerance of contrast medium. Spectral and spatial beam shaping can improve image quality while reducing the radiation dose. Finally, the level of entrance exposure to the image receptor of the fluoroscope as a function of operator choices, of added filter thickness, of selected pulse rate, of the selected field-of-view and of the patient girth all must be addressed at installation.

Citing Articles

Implementing Patient Protection Radiation Dose Alerts for Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Examinations.

Somasundaram E, Hirsch R, Brady S, Minsterman K, Strauss K J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025; 3(12):102292.

PMID: 39807230 PMC: 11725154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102292.


Physical Image Quality Metrics for the Characterization of X-ray Systems Used in Fluoroscopy-Guided Pediatric Cardiac Interventional Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Nocetti D, Villalobos K, Wunderle K Children (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002875 PMC: 10670102. DOI: 10.3390/children10111784.


Comparison of the different imaging modalities used to image pediatric oncology patients: A COG diagnostic imaging committee/SPR oncology committee white paper.

Frush D, Callahan M, Coley B, Nadel H, Guillerman R Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023; 70 Suppl 4:e30298.

PMID: 37025033 PMC: 10652359. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30298.


Local reference and achievable dose levels for vascular and enterostomy access procedures in pediatric interventional radiology.

Shkumat N, Chiramel G, Muthusami P, Parra D, Temple M, Amaral J Pediatr Radiol. 2023; 53(5):942-952.

PMID: 36595081 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05562-w.


Radiation Dose Exposure to Patients During Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure via the Arterial Route.

Alsharif A, Bhat Y, Al Mesned A, Al Qwaee A, Al Akhfash A Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30685.

PMID: 36439608 PMC: 9691471. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30685.


References
1.
Johnson M, Burgess A . Clinical use of a gadolinium filter in pediatric radiography. Pediatr Radiol. 1981; 10(4):229-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF01001588. View

2.
OOSTERKAMP I . Monochromatic x-rays for medical fluoroscopy and radiography?. Medicamundi. 1961; 7:68-77. View

3.
Gray J, Swee R . The elimination of grids during intensified fluoroscopy and photofluoro spot imaging. Radiology. 1982; 144(2):426-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.144.2.7089302. View

4.
Rossi R, Harnisch B, Hendee W . Reduction of radiation exposure in radiography of the chest. Radiology. 1982; 144(4):909-14. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.144.4.7111745. View

5.
McDaniel D, Cohen G, Wagner L, ROBINSON L . Relative dose efficiencies of antiscatter grids and air gaps in pediatric radiography. Med Phys. 1984; 11(4):508-12. DOI: 10.1118/1.595520. View