» Articles » PMID: 16860135

Targeted Genomic Microarray Analysis for Identification of Chromosome Abnormalities in 1500 Consecutive Clinical Cases

Overview
Journal J Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2006 Jul 25
PMID 16860135
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the yield of array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Study Design: The results of array comparative genomic hybridization were collected on 1500 consecutive clinical cases sent to our laboratory for a variety of developmental problems. Confirmation fluorescence in situ hybridization of metaphase or interphase cells, depending on the aberration, was performed.

Results: Of the 1500 cases, 134 (8.9%) showed an abnormality: 36 (2.4%) showed polymorphisms or familial variants, 14 (0.9%) showed alterations of unknown clinical significance, and 84 (5.6%) showed clinically relevant genomic alterations. These included subtelomeric deletions and unbalanced rearrangements, microdeletions and reciprocal duplications, rare abnormalities, and low-level trisomy mosaicism.

Conclusions: A targeted array detects a substantial proportion of abnormalities even in those patients who have already had extensive cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization testing. This study, although not a controlled ascertainment of subjects with specific selection criteria, accurately reflects the reality of clinical cytogenetic practice and provides an estimate of the cytogenetic abnormalities that can be identified with a targeted microarray in a diagnostic laboratory. Microarray analysis likely doubles the current yield of abnormal results detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis.

Citing Articles

Severity Scoring Cutoff for MLPA and Its Diagnostic Yield in 332 North Indian Children with Developmental Delay.

Srivastava P, Kaur P, Daniel R, Chaudhry C, Kaur A, Seth S J Pediatr Genet. 2024; 13(2):81-89.

PMID: 38721576 PMC: 11076085. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757194.


Laryngotracheomalacia in a Patient with Mosaic Trisomy 8.

de Souza M, Hartmann J, Zottis L, Gama T, Rosa E, Zen P J Pediatr Genet. 2024; 13(1):57-61.

PMID: 38567174 PMC: 10984713. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736609.


Reappraisal of evolving methods in non-invasive prenatal screening: Discovery, biology and clinical utility.

Rather R, Saha S Heliyon. 2023; 9(3):e13923.

PMID: 36879971 PMC: 9984859. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13923.


Study on the application value of BACs-on-Beads technology combined with chromosome karyotype analysis in prenatal diagnosis.

Chen L, Du J, Wang J, Chen S, Wang W, Yang W Transl Pediatr. 2022; 11(2):212-218.

PMID: 35282020 PMC: 8905103. DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-16.


Epidemiology of fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly and evaluation of chromosomal microarray analysis versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese hospital.

Yi J, Zhang W, Meng D, Ren L, Yu J, Wei Y J Int Med Res. 2019; 47(11):5508-5517.

PMID: 31422728 PMC: 6862921. DOI: 10.1177/0300060519853405.