» Articles » PMID: 16854848

Does Monthly Native Arteriovenous Fistula Blood-flow Surveillance Detect Significant Stenosis--a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2006 Jul 21
PMID 16854848
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that the preferred method of surveillance for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the measurement of AVF blood flow (Qa). As these recommendations are based on observational studies, we conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial to assess whether Qa surveillance results in an increased detection of AVF stenosis.

Methods: A total of 137 patients were randomly assigned to receive either continuing AVF surveillance using current clinical criteria (control, usual treatment) or usual treatment plus AVF blood-flow surveillance by ultrasound dilution (Qa surveillance group). The primary outcome measure was the detection of a significant (>50%) AVF stenosis.

Results: There were 67 and 68 patients assigned to the control and Qa surveillance groups, respectively. Patients in the Qa surveillance group were twice as likely to have a stenosis detected compared with the control hazard ratio (HR) confidence interval (CI) group (2.27, 95% 0.85-5.98, P = 0.09), with a trend for a significant stenosis to be detected earlier in the Qa surveillance group (P = 0.09, log rank test). However, using the Qa results alone prior to angiography, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated, at best, a moderate prediction of (>50%) AVF stenosis (0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, P = 0.006).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the addition of AVF Qa monitoring to clinical screening for AVF stenosis resulted in a non-significant doubling in the detection of angiographically significant AVF stenosis. Further, large multi-centre randomized trials are feasible and will be necessary to confirm whether Qa surveillance and the correction of detected AVF stenosis will lead to a reduction in AVF thrombosis and increased AVF survival.

Citing Articles

Classifications of haemodialysis vascular access stenosis: a scoping review.

Lawrie K, ONeill S, Malik J, Janousek L, Corr M, Maly S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088045.

PMID: 39819957 PMC: 11751806. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088045.


Guidelines on vascular access for hemodialysis from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery.

Harduin L, Barroso T, Guerra J, Filippo M, de Almeida L, de Castro-Santos G J Vasc Bras. 2023; 22:e20230052.

PMID: 38021275 PMC: 10648056. DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300522.


Reassessing the utility of access recirculation and Kt/V for the prediction of arteriovenous fistula failure using online clearance monitoring: the SHUNT STUDY.

Bodington R, Hazara A, Lamplugh A, Syed A, Bhandari S J Nephrol. 2022; 36(3):677-686.

PMID: 36445562 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01525-4.


Comparing non-invasive diagnostic methods for arteriovenous fistula stenosis: a prospective study.

Raksasuk S, Naweera W, Rojwatcharapibarn S, Srithongkul T J Ultrasound. 2022; 26(3):687-693.

PMID: 36319839 PMC: 10468451. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-022-00731-x.


Weight-Based Assessment of Access Flow Threshold to Predict Arteriovenous Fistula Functional Patency.

Yang C, Wu B, Wang Y, Wu Lee Y, Tarng D Kidney Int Rep. 2022; 7(3):507-515.

PMID: 35257063 PMC: 8897684. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.11.016.