» Articles » PMID: 16845551

New Fundamental Resistance Exercise Determinants of Molecular and Cellular Muscle Adaptations

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2006 Jul 18
PMID 16845551
Citations 137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abstract Physical activity relies on muscular force. In adult skeletal muscle, force results from the contraction of postmitotic, multinucleated myofibres of different contractile and metabolic properties. Myofibres can adapt to (patho-)physiological conditions of altered functional demand by radial growth, longitudinal growth, and regulation of fibre type functional gene modules. The adaptation's specificity depends on the distinct molecular and cellular events triggered by unique combinations of conditional cues. In order to derive effective and tailored exercise prescriptions, it must be determined (1) which mechano-biological condition leads to what molecular/cellular response, and (2) how this molecular/cellular response relates to the structural, contractile, and metabolic adaptation. It follows that a thorough mechano-biological description of the loading condition is imperative. Unfortunately, the definition of (resistance) exercise conditions in the past and present literature is insufficient. It is classically limited to load magnitude, number of repetitions and sets, rest in-between sets, number of interventions/week, and training period. In this review, we show why the current description is insufficient, and identify new determinants of quantitative and/or qualitative effects on skeletal muscle with respect to resistance exercise in healthy, adult humans. These new mandatory determinants comprise the fractional and temporal distribution of the contraction modes per repetition, duration of one repetition, rest in-between repetitions, time under tension, muscular failure, range of motion, recovery time, and anatomical definition. We strongly recommend to standardise the design and description of all future resistance exercise investigations by using the herein proposed set of 13 mechano-biological determinants (classical and new ones).

Citing Articles

Are Perceived Effort Scales (OMNI-RES) Appropriate for Defining and Controlling Strength Training Intensity?.

Mate-Munoz J, Maicas-Perez L, Aparicio-Garcia I, Hernandez-Lougedo J, De Sousa-De Sousa L, Hontoria-Galan M Sports (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997988 PMC: 11860584. DOI: 10.3390/sports13020057.


Myofascial System and Physical Exercise: A Narrative Review on Stiffening (Part II).

Colonna S, Casacci F Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76295.

PMID: 39850177 PMC: 11755199. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76295.


Electrocortical activity during resistance exercises in healthy young adults-a systematic review.

Visser A, Piskin D, Buchel D, Baumeister J Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1466776.

PMID: 39664745 PMC: 11631587. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1466776.


Variability in resistance training trajectories of breast cancer patients undergoing therapy.

Koeppel M, Steindorf K, Schmidt M, Rosenberger F, Wiskemann J Support Care Cancer. 2024; 33(1):12.

PMID: 39656317 PMC: 11631991. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09001-4.


Hip strengthening exercise dosage is not associated with clinical improvements after total hip arthroplasty - a prospective cohort study (the PHETHAS-1 study).

Madsen M, Mikkelsen L, Rathleff M, Thorborg K, Kallemose T, Bandholm T BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):928.

PMID: 39563311 PMC: 11577667. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08057-x.


References
1.
Moore D, Burgomaster K, Schofield L, Gibala M, Sale D, Phillips S . Neuromuscular adaptations in human muscle following low intensity resistance training with vascular occlusion. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004; 92(4-5):399-406. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1072-y. View

2.
Toigo M, Donohoe S, Sperrazzo G, Jarrold B, Wang F, Hinkle R . ICAT-MS-MS time course analysis of atrophying mouse skeletal muscle cytosolic subproteome. Mol Biosyst. 2006; 1(3):229-41. DOI: 10.1039/b507839c. View

3.
Hoppeler H, Vogt M, Weibel E, Fluck M . Response of skeletal muscle mitochondria to hypoxia. Exp Physiol. 2003; 88(1):109-19. DOI: 10.1113/eph8802513. View

4.
St-Amand J, Okamura K, Matsumoto K, Shimizu S, Sogawa Y . Characterization of control and immobilized skeletal muscle: an overview from genetic engineering. FASEB J. 2001; 15(3):684-92. DOI: 10.1096/fj.00-0150com. View

5.
Takahashi A, Kureishi Y, Yang J, Luo Z, Guo K, Mukhopadhyay D . Myogenic Akt signaling regulates blood vessel recruitment during myofiber growth. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22(13):4803-14. PMC: 133891. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.13.4803-4814.2002. View