» Articles » PMID: 1684330

Lack of Underdominance in a Naturally Occurring Pericentric Inversion in Drosophila Melanogaster and Its Implications for Chromosome Evolution

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1991 Nov 1
PMID 1684330
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In(2LR)PL is a large pericentric inversion polymorphic in populations of Drosophila melanogaster on two Indian Ocean islands. This polymorphism is puzzling: because crossing over in female heterokaryotypes produces inviable zygotes, such inversions are thought to be underdominant and should be quickly eliminated from populations. The observed fixation for such inversions among related species has led to the idea that genetic drift can cause chromosome evolution in opposition to natural selection. We found, however, that In(2LR)PL is not underdominant for fertility, as heterokaryotypic females produce perfectly viable eggs. Genetic analysis shows that the lack of underdominance results from the nearly complete absence of crossing over in the inverted region. This phenomenon is probably caused by mechanical and not genetic factors, because crossing over is not suppressed in In(2LR)PL homokaryotypes. Our observations do not support the idea that the fixation of pericentric inversions among closely related species implies the action of genetic drift overcoming strong natural selection in very small populations. If chromosome arrangements vary in their underdominance, it is those with the least disadvantage as heterozygotes, like In(2LR)PL, that will be polymorphic or fixed in natural populations.

Citing Articles

How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis.

Fuller Z, Koury S, Phadnis N, Schaeffer S Mol Ecol. 2018; 28(6):1283-1301.

PMID: 30402909 PMC: 6475473. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14923.


Genome Structure of the Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens and Its Stability on Metalliferous and Nonmetalliferous Soils.

Mandakova T, Singh V, Kramer U, Lysak M Plant Physiol. 2015; 169(1):674-89.

PMID: 26195571 PMC: 4577401. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00619.


General survey of hAT transposon superfamily with highlight on hobo element in Drosophila.

Ladeveze V, Chaminade N, Lemeunier F, Periquet G, Aulard S Genetica. 2012; 140(7-9):375-92.

PMID: 23111927 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-012-9687-0.


Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation?.

Jackson B Genetica. 2011; 139(3):393-402.

PMID: 21327492 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9558-0.


Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation.

Bedinger P, Chetelat R, McClure B, Moyle L, Rose J, Stack S Sex Plant Reprod. 2010; 24(3):171-87.

PMID: 21076968 DOI: 10.1007/s00497-010-0155-7.


References
1.
Martin J . Meiosis in inversion heterozygotes in Chironomidae. Can J Genet Cytol. 1967; 9(1):255-68. DOI: 10.1139/g67-021. View

2.
Roberts P . Screening for x-ray-induced crossover suppressors in Drosophila melanogaster: prevalence and effectiveness of translocations. Genetics. 1970; 65(3):429-48. PMC: 1212456. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/65.3.429. View

3.
Roberts P . A positive correlation between crossing over within heterozygous pericentric inversions and reduced egg hatch of Drosophila females. Genetics. 1967; 56(1):179-87. PMC: 1211488. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/56.1.179. View

4.
Greenbaum I, Reed M . Evidence for heterosynaptic pairing of the inverted segment in pericentric inversion heterozygotes of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus). Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1984; 38(2):106-11. DOI: 10.1159/000132040. View

5.
Hawley R . Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites. Genetics. 1980; 94(3):625-46. PMC: 1214164. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/94.3.625. View