» Articles » PMID: 16838217

The Coevolution of Genes and Genetic Codes: Crick's Frozen Accident Revisited

Overview
Journal J Mol Evol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2006 Jul 14
PMID 16838217
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The standard genetic code is the nearly universal system for the translation of genes into proteins. The code exhibits two salient structural characteristics: it possesses a distinct organization that makes it extremely robust to errors in replication and translation, and it is highly redundant. The origin of these properties has intrigued researchers since the code was first discovered. One suggestion, which is the subject of this review, is that the code's organization is the outcome of the coevolution of genes and genetic codes. In 1968, Francis Crick explored the possible implications of coevolution at different stages of code evolution. Although he argues that coevolution was likely to influence the evolution of the code, he concludes that it falls short of explaining the organization of the code we see today. The recent application of mathematical modeling to study the effects of errors on the course of coevolution, suggests a different conclusion. It shows that coevolution readily generates genetic codes that are highly redundant and similar in their error-correcting organization to the standard code. We review this recent work and suggest that further affirmation of the role of coevolution can be attained by investigating the extent to which the outcome of coevolution is robust to other influences that were present during the evolution of the code.

Citing Articles

Order of amino acid recruitment into the genetic code resolved by last universal common ancestor's protein domains.

Wehbi S, Wheeler A, Morel B, Manepalli N, Minh B, Lauretta D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(52):e2410311121.

PMID: 39665745 PMC: 11670089. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410311121.


Order of amino acid recruitment into the genetic code resolved by Last Universal Common Ancestor's protein domains.

Wehbi S, Wheeler A, Morel B, Manepalli N, Minh B, Lauretta D bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38659899 PMC: 11042313. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.13.589375.


The Genetic Code Assembles via Division and Fusion, Basic Cellular Events.

Yarus M Life (Basel). 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37895450 PMC: 10608286. DOI: 10.3390/life13102069.


Origins of Genetic Coding: Self-Guided Molecular Self-Organisation.

Wills P Entropy (Basel). 2023; 25(9).

PMID: 37761580 PMC: 10527755. DOI: 10.3390/e25091281.


Self-similarity and the maximum entropy principle in the genetic code.

Kak S Theory Biosci. 2023; 142(3):205-210.

PMID: 37402087 DOI: 10.1007/s12064-023-00396-y.


References
1.
Eigen M, Schuster P . The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. Naturwissenschaften. 1977; 64(11):541-65. DOI: 10.1007/BF00450633. View

2.
Topal M, Fresco J . Complementary base pairing and the origin of substitution mutations. Nature. 1976; 263(5575):285-9. DOI: 10.1038/263285a0. View

3.
Di Giulio M . The phylogeny of tRNAs seems to confirm the predictions of the coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1995; 25(6):549-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF01582024. View

4.
Freeland S, Wu T, Keulmann N . The case for an error minimizing standard genetic code. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2003; 33(4-5):457-77. DOI: 10.1023/a:1025771327614. View

5.
Parker J . Errors and alternatives in reading the universal genetic code. Microbiol Rev. 1989; 53(3):273-98. PMC: 372737. DOI: 10.1128/mr.53.3.273-298.1989. View