» Articles » PMID: 16836636

Object Representation in the Human Auditory System

Overview
Journal Eur J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Jul 14
PMID 16836636
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One important principle of object processing is exclusive allocation. Any part of the sensory input, including the border between two objects, can only belong to one object at a time. We tested whether tones forming a spectro-temporal border between two sound patterns can belong to both patterns at the same time. Sequences were composed of low-, intermediate- and high-pitched tones. Tones were delivered with short onset-to-onset intervals causing the high and low tones to automatically form separate low and high sound streams. The intermediate-pitch tones could be perceived as part of either one or the other stream, but not both streams at the same time. Thus these tones formed a pitch 'border' between the two streams. The tones were presented in a fixed, cyclically repeating order. Linking the intermediate-pitch tones with the high or the low tones resulted in the perception of two different repeating tonal patterns. Participants were instructed to maintain perception of one of the two tone patterns throughout the stimulus sequences. Occasional changes violated either the selected or the alternative tone pattern, but not both at the same time. We found that only violations of the selected pattern elicited the mismatch negativity event-related potential, indicating that only this pattern was represented in the auditory system. This result suggests that individual sounds are processed as part of only one auditory pattern at a time. Thus tones forming a spectro-temporal border are exclusively assigned to one sound object at any given time, as are spatio-temporal borders in vision.

Citing Articles

Do we parse the background into separate streams in the cocktail party?.

Szalardy O, Toth B, Farkas D, Orosz G, Winkler I Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:952557.

PMID: 36393982 PMC: 9649784. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.952557.


Modulation change detection in human auditory cortex: Evidence for asymmetric, non-linear edge detection.

Kim S, Poeppel D, Overath T Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 52(2):2889-2904.

PMID: 32080939 PMC: 7368805. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14707.


Neural Decoding of Bistable Sounds Reveals an Effect of Intention on Perceptual Organization.

Billig A, Davis M, Carlyon R J Neurosci. 2018; 38(11):2844-2853.

PMID: 29440556 PMC: 5852662. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-17.2018.


Selective entrainment of brain oscillations drives auditory perceptual organization.

Costa-Faidella J, Sussman E, Escera C Neuroimage. 2017; 159:195-206.

PMID: 28757195 PMC: 5671350. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.056.


Differential activation of human core, non-core and auditory-related cortex during speech categorization tasks as revealed by intracranial recordings.

Steinschneider M, Nourski K, Rhone A, Kawasaki H, Oya H, Howard 3rd M Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:240.

PMID: 25157216 PMC: 4128221. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00240.


References
1.
Duncan J . Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984; 113(4):501-17. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501. View

2.
Baker K, Williams S, Nicolson R . Evaluating frequency proximity in stream segregation. Percept Psychophys. 2000; 62(1):81-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212062. View

3.
Bregman A, Ahad P, Crum P, OReilly J . Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation. Percept Psychophys. 2000; 62(3):626-36. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212114. View

4.
Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Naatanen R . Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998; 10(5):590-604. DOI: 10.1162/089892998562997. View

5.
Woldorff M . Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. Psychophysiology. 1993; 30(1):98-119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03209.x. View