» Articles » PMID: 16834823

The Impact of Dosing Frequency on Compliance and Persistence with Bisphosphonates Among Postmenopausal Women in the UK: Evidence from Three Databases

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2006 Jul 13
PMID 16834823
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bisphosphonates are currently among the most effective therapies for the treatment of osteoporosis and provide one of the mainstays of treatment in the UK. However studies in several countries have all reported sub-optimal compliance and persistence with treatment.

Objective: To examine the impact of dosing frequency on compliance and persistence with bisphosphonates in the UK.

Methods: Three UK General Practitioner sourced databases, the General Practice Research Database (GPRD), IMS Disease Analyzer (MEDIPLUS) and the Doctors Independent Network Database (DIN-LINK) were used to identify bisphosphonate naïve postmenopausal women. In each of the three retrospective analyses women were grouped into weekly or daily cohorts and followed for 12 months from an initial prescription. Compliance was measured as a Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), defined as the proportion of days for which patients had prescription coverage. Persistence was measured as the number of continuous days of treatment from the initial prescription to the end of the last prescription issued in the follow-up period.

Results: GPRD, MEDIPLUS and DIN-LINK provided access to 7567, 5962 and 1801 women, respectively. All three analyses consistently demonstrated that those on weekly regimens had a higher MPR than those on daily regimens (GPRD 76.2%, CI(95%,) 75.4-77.0 vs. 63.5%, CI(95%) 61.2-65.8, MEDIPLUS 70.3%, CI(95%) 69.3-71.2 vs. 56.3%, CI(95%) 53.8-58.9, DIN-LINK 59.5%, CI(95%) 59.4-59.6 vs. 46.3%, CI(95%) 45.9-46.7) (p < 0.0001) and persisted longer with treatment (GPRD 249, CI(95%) 246-253 vs. 208, CI(95%) 199-217, MEDIPLUS 228, CI(95%) 224-231 vs. 186, CI(95%,) 176-196, DIN-LINK 235, CI(95%) 234-236 vs. 189, CI(95%) 187-191) days respectively), (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Although this study only provided an indirect measure of medication usage, it demonstrated that a less frequent dosing regimen significantly improved levels of both compliance and persistence; however, even on weekly regimens bisphosphonate usage remains sub-optimal thereby reducing the clinical benefits.

Citing Articles

A Scalable Platform for Fabricating Biodegradable Microparticles with Pulsatile Drug Release.

Graf T, Qiu S, Varshney D, Laracuente M, Euliano E, Munnangi P Adv Mater. 2023; 35(22):e2300228.

PMID: 36862114 PMC: 10247432. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202300228.


Adherence of bisphosphonate and decreased risk of clinical vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: A propensity score matching analysis.

Kim S, Chung Y, Lee Y Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2022; 8(3):98-105.

PMID: 36268493 PMC: 9577186. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2022.05.004.


Effect of Dosing Interval on Compliance of Osteoporosis Patients on Bisphosphonate Therapy: Observational Study Using Nationwide Insurance Claims Data.

Lee H, Lee S, Kim D, Cho W, Cho S, Yoon S J Clin Med. 2021; 10(19).

PMID: 34640368 PMC: 8509687. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194350.


Persistence and compliance with osteoporosis therapies among postmenopausal women in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Morley J, Moayyeri A, Ali L, Taylor A, Feudjo-Tepie M, Hamilton L Osteoporos Int. 2019; 31(3):533-545.

PMID: 31758206 PMC: 7076063. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05228-8.


Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Fatoye F, Smith P, Gebrye T, Yeowell G BMJ Open. 2019; 9(4):e027049.

PMID: 30987990 PMC: 6500256. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027049.