» Articles » PMID: 16831143

Pathological Changes of High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Prostate Cancer After Monotherapy with Bicalutamide 150 Mg

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2006 Jul 13
PMID 16831143
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the morphological changes induced by a 3-month course of neoadjuvant bicalutamide 150 mg/day before radical prostatectomy (RP) on prostatic adenocarcinoma and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN).

Patients And Methods: In all, 90 patients with cT1-T2 prostate cancer and HGPIN on prostatic biopsy were randomized to receive bicalutamide (150 mg/day for 3 months) before RP, or to have immediate surgery. Surgical specimens were assessed for the histopathological features of cancer, HGPIN and benign epithelium in a blinded manner. The volumes of prostate cancer and HGPIN were evaluated using a stereological (i.e. grid) method.

Results: Compared with the bicalutamide-treated group, the ratio of stroma to epithelium, evaluated by visual microscopic assessment in the normal epithelium of the three prostate zones, was significantly lower in the control group, at 2.27 (sd 1.13), than in the treated group, at 1.87 (sd 0.72) (P = 0.048). The mean (sd) tumour volume was significantly lower in the bicalutamide-treated than in the control group, at 0.914 (0.13) vs 1.47 (0.24) mL (P = 0.044). Similarly, the mean (sd) volume of HGPIN was significantly lower in the bicalutamide-treated than in the control group, at 0.34 (0.06) vs 0.62 (0.07) mL (P = 0.003). At RP, specimen Gleason scores in the bicalutamide-treated group were similar to those in the control group, and were no different from the biopsy Gleason scores.

Conclusions: Involution and epithelial shrinkage of prostate cancer and HGPIN were evident after neoadjuvant treatment with bicalutamide 150 mg. There was no evidence of the emergence of higher-grade cancer after treatment.

Citing Articles

Do androgen-directed therapies improve outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nayak A, Flaman A, Mallick R, Lavallee L, Fergusson D, Cagiannos I Can Urol Assoc J. 2021; 15(8):269-279.

PMID: 33443481 PMC: 8418268. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7041.


Total intraglandular and index tumor volumes predict biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Shin S, Park C, Park S, Jang W, Lee J, Choi Y Virchows Arch. 2016; 469(3):305-12.

PMID: 27306657 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-1971-4.


Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer.

Kunath F, Grobe H, Rucker G, Motschall E, Antes G, Dahm P Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (6):CD009266.

PMID: 24979481 PMC: 10982944. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009266.pub2.


Surgical stress delays prostate involution in mice.

Hassan S, Karpova Y, Flores A, DAgostino Jr R, Kulik G PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e78175.

PMID: 24223137 PMC: 3819334. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078175.


Behavioral stress accelerates prostate cancer development in mice.

Hassan S, Karpova Y, Baiz D, Yancey D, Pullikuth A, Flores A J Clin Invest. 2013; 123(2):874-86.

PMID: 23348742 PMC: 3561807. DOI: 10.1172/JCI63324.