Choice and Segmented Interreinforcement Intervals
Overview
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
Pigeons were trained on a two-key concurrent schedule, where food reinforcers on one key were arranged by a simple variable-interval schedule and on the other key by a chain variable-interval variable-interval schedule. When the initial link of the chain was in effect, the pigeons tended to respond more on the simple variable-interval schedule, and hence less on the chain, than would be expected from a comparison of both the local and overall rates of reinforcement of the two schedules. When the terminal link of the chain was in effect, the pigeons responded more on the chain than would be expected from a comparison of the rates of reinforcement of the schedules then in effect. Overall responding on the chain was not proportional to overall reinforcement on the chain but rather was a by-product of responding during initial- and terminal-link phases.
A quantitative analysis of chain-schedule performance.
Davison M, McCarthy D J Exp Anal Behav. 1989; 51(1):119-43.
PMID: 16812574 PMC: 1338896. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-119.
Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules.
Royalty P, Williams B, Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav. 1987; 47(1):41-56.
PMID: 3559458 PMC: 1348296. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-41.
Effects of reinforcement context on choice.
Jacob T, Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav. 1988; 49(3):367-81.
PMID: 3385353 PMC: 1338797. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-367.