» Articles » PMID: 16811360

Delayed Reinforcement Versus Reinforcement After a Fixed Interval

Overview
Date 1969 May 1
PMID 16811360
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When interreinforcement intervals were equated, pigeons demonstrated little or no preference between reinforcement after a delay interval and reinforcement presented on a fixed-interval schedule. The small preferences sometimes found for the fixed interval (a) were considerably smaller than when the delay and fixed intervals differed in duration, and (b) were caused by the absence of light during the delay. These results suggest that the effects of delayed reinforcement on prior responding can be reproduced by imposing a temporally equal fixed-interval schedule in place of the delay; and, therefore, that the time between a response and reinforcement controls the probability of that response, whether other responses intervene or not.

Citing Articles

To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?.

Andrews D, Zentall T Learn Behav. 2018; 47(3):217-226.

PMID: 30421124 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-018-0365-7.


Regularities in responding during performance of a complex choice task.

Mercado 3rd E, Orduna V Learn Behav. 2015; 43(4):323-41.

PMID: 26077440 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0182-1.


A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Aparicio C, Elcoro M, Alonso-Alvarez B Learn Behav. 2015; 43(3):251-71.

PMID: 25862317 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0177-y.


Leaving patches: Effects of travel requirements.

McCarthy D, Voss P, Davison M J Exp Anal Behav. 1994; 62(2):185-200.

PMID: 16812740 PMC: 1334457. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-185.


Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.

Omino T, Ito M J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 59(2):361-71.

PMID: 16812690 PMC: 1322048. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-361.


References
1.
Neuringer A, Schneider B . Separating the effects of interreinforcement time and number of interreinforcement responses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968; 11(6):661-7. PMC: 1338619. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-661. View

2.
Neuringer A, Chung S . Quasi-reinforcement: control of responding by a percentage-reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(1):45-54. PMC: 1338316. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-45. View

3.
Dews P . The effect of multiple S periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: IV. Effect of continuous S with only short S probes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966; 9(2):147-51. PMC: 1338168. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-147. View

4.
Chung S, Herrnstein R . Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(1):67-74. PMC: 1338319. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. View

5.
Dews P . Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960; 3:221-34. PMC: 1404022. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-221. View