Delayed Reinforcement Versus Reinforcement After a Fixed Interval
Overview
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
When interreinforcement intervals were equated, pigeons demonstrated little or no preference between reinforcement after a delay interval and reinforcement presented on a fixed-interval schedule. The small preferences sometimes found for the fixed interval (a) were considerably smaller than when the delay and fixed intervals differed in duration, and (b) were caused by the absence of light during the delay. These results suggest that the effects of delayed reinforcement on prior responding can be reproduced by imposing a temporally equal fixed-interval schedule in place of the delay; and, therefore, that the time between a response and reinforcement controls the probability of that response, whether other responses intervene or not.
To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?.
Andrews D, Zentall T Learn Behav. 2018; 47(3):217-226.
PMID: 30421124 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-018-0365-7.
Regularities in responding during performance of a complex choice task.
Mercado 3rd E, Orduna V Learn Behav. 2015; 43(4):323-41.
PMID: 26077440 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0182-1.
A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.
Aparicio C, Elcoro M, Alonso-Alvarez B Learn Behav. 2015; 43(3):251-71.
PMID: 25862317 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0177-y.
Leaving patches: Effects of travel requirements.
McCarthy D, Voss P, Davison M J Exp Anal Behav. 1994; 62(2):185-200.
PMID: 16812740 PMC: 1334457. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-185.
Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.
Omino T, Ito M J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 59(2):361-71.
PMID: 16812690 PMC: 1322048. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-361.