» Articles » PMID: 16809727

HER2 Testing by Local, Central, and Reference Laboratories in Specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2006 Jul 1
PMID 16809727
Citations 139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing results in patients from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 adjuvant trial of trastuzumab.

Patients And Methods: NCCTG N9831 is a randomized, phase III clinical trial comparing three drug regimens: doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab added concurrently, sequentially, or not at all as adjuvant therapy for women with HER2-positive resected breast cancer. Originally, patients were eligible if their tumors were HER2 positive by either local laboratory immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A protocol modification in 2002 made central laboratory testing mandatory, with additional testing of discordant cases conducted by a reference laboratory. Concordance between local and central laboratory, and level of agreement between central and reference laboratory HER2 findings in discordant cases were examined.

Results: HER2 positivity was confirmed in 85.8% of 2,535 patients registered since March 2002. When local and central evaluation used the same methodology, concordance was 88.1% for FISH and 81.6% for a diagnostic test for presence of the HER2 protein. Among discordant cases examined at the reference laboratory, there was 94.3% agreement for IHC (0, 1+, 2+) and 95.2% agreement for FISH (not gene amplified).

Conclusion: There was a high degree of discordance between local and central testing for IHC and FISH, but a high degree of agreement between central and reference laboratories. These findings support the importance of using high-volume, experienced laboratories for HER2 testing to improve the process of selecting patients likely to benefit from trastuzumab therapy.

Citing Articles

Pooled clinical trial analyses evaluating outcomes of HER2-low vs HER2-0 expression in patients with metastatic breast cancer following chemotherapy.

Lamont E, Stein E, Tarantino P, Tolaney S, Ahlberg C, Chinnathambu K Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 210(1):11-14.

PMID: 39707103 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07581-7.


Ultrasound Radiomics for the Prediction of Breast Cancers with HER2-Zero, -Low, and -Positive Status: A Dual-Center Study.

Yin Y, Mo S, Li G, Wu H, Hu J, Zheng J Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241292668.

PMID: 39470030 PMC: 11526407. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241292668.


Hormone receptor conversion in metastatic breast cancer.

Prochazkova K, Vojtisek R, Vodicka J, Horova J, Hosek P, Skala M Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024; 28(6):746-755.

PMID: 38515821 PMC: 10954261. DOI: 10.5603/rpor.98730.


Machine learning-based model constructed from ultrasound radiomics and clinical features for predicting HER2 status in breast cancer patients with indeterminate (2+) immunohistochemical results.

Yan M, Yao J, Zhang X, Xu D, Yang C Cancer Med. 2024; 13(3):e6946.

PMID: 38234171 PMC: 10905683. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6946.


Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

Viale G, Basik M, Niikura N, Tokunaga E, Brucker S, Penault-Llorca F ESMO Open. 2023; 8(4):101615.

PMID: 37562195 PMC: 10515285. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101615.