» Articles » PMID: 16803811

Dental Safety Net: Current Capacity and Potential for Expansion

Overview
Journal J Am Dent Assoc
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2006 Jun 29
PMID 16803811
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The authors' objectives were to determine the size and characteristics of the dentally underserved U.S. population, describe the capacity of the safety net system to treat the underserved, explore policy options for expanding the system and discuss the policy implications of these findings.

Methods: The data came from published reports from health care organizations and researchers, as well as from public officials, dental educators and clinic directors. The values presented are estimates from available data.

Results: The underserved population consists of 82 million people from low-income families. Only 27.8 percent of this population visits a dentist each year. The primary components of the safety net are dental clinics in community health centers, hospitals, public schools and dental schools. This system has the capacity to care for about 7 to 8 million people annually. The politically feasible options for expanding the system include increasing the number of community clinics and their efficiency, requiring dental school graduates to receive one year of residency training, and requiring senior dental students and residents to work 60 days in community clinics and practices. This could increase the capacity of the system to treat about 10 million people annually.

Conclusions And Clinical Implications: The safety net system has limited capacity but could be improved to care for another 2.5 million people. Even if it is expanded, however, the majority of low-income patients would need to obtain care in private practices to reduce access disparities. The biggest challenge is convincing the American people to provide the funds needed to care for the poor in safety net clinics and private practices.

Citing Articles

Visits to US emergency departments by 20- to 29-year-olds with toothache during 2001-2010.

Lewis C, McKinney C, Lee H, Melbye M, Rue T J Am Dent Assoc. 2015; 146(5):295-302.e2.

PMID: 25925521 PMC: 4418214. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.01.013.


Assessing the contribution of the dental care delivery system to oral health care disparities.

Pourat N, Andersen R, Marcus M J Public Health Dent. 2014; 75(1):1-9.

PMID: 24964016 PMC: 4276727. DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12064.


Patient characteristics and trends in nontraumatic dental condition visits to emergency departments in the United States.

Okunseri C, Okunseri E, Thorpe J, Xiang Q, Szabo A Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013; 4:1-7.

PMID: 23674919 PMC: 3652363. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDEN.S28168.


Exploring the potential for foreign-trained dentists to address workforce shortages and improve access to dental care for vulnerable populations in the United States: a case study from Washington State.

Bazargan N, Chi D, Milgrom P BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:336.

PMID: 21143987 PMC: 3017531. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-336.


Federally qualified health center dental program finances: a case study.

Beazoglou T, Bailit H, Maule M Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(6):888-95.

PMID: 21121234 PMC: 2966670. DOI: 10.1177/003335491012500616.