» Articles » PMID: 16795573

Differential Effects of Fixed- and Variable-time Feedback on Production Rates of Elementary School Children

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1977 Jan 1
PMID 16795573
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The performance of 26 third-grade students who worked on individual weekly academic tasks was compared under fixed- and variable-time "home reports". During fixed-time home reports, each student was given a report to take home on Friday that indicated the quantity of work the student had completed that week, contained comments concerning the quality of the work, and had a space for parental remarks and signature. The same report was given during the variable-time reports, except that seven to nine students were randomly selected each day to receive a home report. During variable-time reporting, students completed more assignments and completed assignments on a greater percentage of available workdays than during fixed-time reporting. The teachers' preference for the variable-time reporting was one additional advantage for the variable system.

Citing Articles

A Descriptive Analysis of Applied Behavior Analysis Research With Economically Disadvantaged Children.

Fontenot B, Uwayo M, Avendano S, Ross D Behav Anal Pract. 2020; 12(4):782-794.

PMID: 31976290 PMC: 6834796. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-019-00389-8.


A behaviorist's response to the report of the national commission on excellence in education.

Sulzer-Azaroff B Behav Anal. 2012; 8(1):29-38.

PMID: 22478618 PMC: 2741770. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391910.


Generating variable and random schedules of reinforcement using Microsoft Excel macros.

Bancroft S, Bourret J J Appl Behav Anal. 2008; 41(2):227-35.

PMID: 18595286 PMC: 2408339. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-227.


A comparison of the effects of fixed and variable ratio schedules of reinforcement on the behavior of deaf children.

Van Houten R, Nau P J Appl Behav Anal. 1980; 13(1):13-21.

PMID: 7364692 PMC: 1308102. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-13.

References
1.
Lovitt T, Esveldt K . The relative effects on math performance of single- versus multiple-ratio schedules: a case study. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970; 3(4):261-70. PMC: 1311130. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-261. View

2.
Mawhinney V, Bostow D, Laws D, Blumenfeld G, Hopkins B . A comparison of students studying-behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971; 4(4):257-64. PMC: 1310703. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-257. View

3.
Weiner H . Controlling human fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(3):349-73. PMC: 1338595. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-349. View

4.
Bijou S, Orlando R . Rapid development of multiple-schedule performances with retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4(1):7-16. PMC: 1403984. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-7. View

5.
Schroeder S . Parametric effects of reinforcement frequency, amount of reinforcement, and required response force on sheltered workshop behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972; 5(4):431-41. PMC: 1310785. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-431. View