» Articles » PMID: 16795371

Effects of Reinforcement on Standardized Test Performance

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1972 Jan 1
PMID 16795371
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of two different motivational conditions upon standardized test performance were explored for two student populations. The first study involving 12 trainable retardates showed a significant increase in score on the Metropolitan Readiness Test given under reinforcement conditions when these results were compared with scores taken under standard testing conditions. In a second study, these same results were obtained with a group of 30 normal fourth-graders. An additional study was conducted to determine the effect of different experiences with token reinforcement procedures on test performance. It was found that a group of children with six weeks' exposure to reinforcement for daily academic performance scored higher under both conditions of test administration (standard and reinforcement) than a control group. However, in a single exposure to token reinforcement for correct performance on the Metropolitan Test, both the experimental group and its match control showed a parallel increase in test performance. These findings offer a procedure that yields a more representative assessment of a student's academic achievement than does testing under standard conditions.

Citing Articles

Hard evidence on soft skills.

Heckman J, Kautz T Labour Econ. 2013; 19(4):451-464.

PMID: 23559694 PMC: 3612993. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.


The effects of primary reward on the I.Q. performance of grade-school children as a function of initial I.Q. level.

Clingman J, Fowler R J Appl Behav Anal. 1976; 9(1):19-23.

PMID: 16795514 PMC: 1311892. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-19.


A brief report clarifying the effects of distributional shifts on standardized test statistics.

Hartmann D J Appl Behav Anal. 1975; 8(3):349-50.

PMID: 16795499 PMC: 1311863. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-349.


Selection by consequences: one unifying principle for a transdisciplinary science of prevention.

Biglan A Prev Sci. 2003; 4(4):213-32.

PMID: 14598995 DOI: 10.1023/a:1026064014562.


A brief discussion of the efficacy of raising standardized test scores by contingent reinforcement.

OConnor J, Weiss F J Appl Behav Anal. 1974; 7(2):351-2.

PMID: 4436185 PMC: 1311976. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-351.


References
1.
OLeary K, Becker W . Behavior modification of an adjustment class: a token reinforcement program. Except Child. 1967; 33(9):637-42. View

2.
OLeary K, Becker W, Evans M, Saudargas R . A token reinforcement program in a public school: a replication and systematic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969; 2(1):3-13. PMC: 1311029. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-3. View