How Effective Are Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics? Prognosis of Incident Angina and Non-cardiac Chest Pain in 8762 Consecutive Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To determine whether rapid access chest pain clinics are clinically effective by comparison of coronary event rates in patients diagnosed with angina with rates in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain and the general population.
Design: Multicentre cohort study of consecutive patients with chest pain attending the rapid access chest pain clinics (RACPCs) of six hospitals in England.
Participants: 8762 patients diagnosed with either non-cardiac chest pain (n = 6396) or incident angina without prior myocardial infarction (n = 2366) at first cardiological assessment, followed up for a median of 2.57 (interquartile range 1.96-4.15) years.
Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point--death due to coronary heart disease (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)10 I20-I25) or acute coronary syndrome (non-fatal myocardial infarction (ICD10 I21-I23), hospital admission with unstable angina (I24.0, I24.8, I24.9)). Secondary end points--all-cause mortality (ICD I20), cardiovascular death (ICD10 I00-I99), or non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke (I60-I69).
Results: The cumulative probability of the primary end point in patients diagnosed with angina was 16.52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.88% to 18.32%) after 3 years compared with 2.73% (95% CI 2.29% to 3.25%) in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Coronary standardised mortality ratios for men and women with angina aged <65 years were 3.52 (95% CI 1.98 to 5.07) and 4.39 (95% CI 1.14 to 7.64). Of the 599 patients who had the primary end point, 194 (32.4%) had been diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain. These patients were younger, less likely to have typical symptoms, more likely to be south Asian and more likely to have a normal resting electrocardiogram than patients with angina who had the primary end point.
Conclusion: RACPCs are successful in identifying patients with incident angina who are at high coronary risk, but there is a need to reduce misdiagnosis and improve outcomes in patients diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain who accounted for nearly one third of cardiac events during follow-up.
The prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with 'non-anginal chest pain'.
Chick W, Macnab A Br J Cardiol. 2024; 31(1):009.
PMID: 39323947 PMC: 11421066. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2024.009.
NICE guidelines in the Sunderland RACPC cohort study: one size does not fit all.
Hesse K, Htet Z, Jachuck M, Jenkins N Br J Cardiol. 2024; 30(3):28.
PMID: 39144097 PMC: 11321461. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2023.028.
Chen J, Oshima T, Kondo T, Tomita T, Fukui H, Shinzaki S J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023; 29(4):446-454.
PMID: 37814435 PMC: 10577468. DOI: 10.5056/jnm22184.
Berry C, Kramer C, Kunadian V, Patel T, Villines T, Kwong R Eur Heart J. 2023; 44(26):2366-2375.
PMID: 36917627 PMC: 10327881. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac597.
Jordan K, Rathod-Mistry T, van der Windt D, Bailey J, Chen Y, Clarson L Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023; 30(11):1151-1161.
PMID: 36895179 PMC: 10442054. DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad055.