» Articles » PMID: 16775778

Association of Transmembrane Helices: What Determines Assembling of a Dimer?

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Jun 16
PMID 16775778
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Self-association of two hydrophobic alpha-helices is studied via unrestrained Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in a hydrophobic slab described by an effective potential. The system under study represents two transmembrane (TM) segments of human glycophorin A (GpA), which form homo-dimers in membranes. The influence of TM electrostatic potential, thickness and hydrophobicity degree of lipid bilayer is investigated. It is shown that the membrane environment stabilizes alpha-helical conformation of GpA monomers, induces their TM insertion and facilitates inter-helical contacts. Head-to-head orientation of the helices is promoted by the voltage difference across the membrane. Subsequent "fine-tuned" assembling of the dimer is mediated by van der Waals interactions. Only the models of dimer, calculated in a hydrophobic slab with applied voltage agree with experimental data, while simulations in vacuo or without TM voltage fail to give reasonable results. The moderate structural heterogeneity of GpA dimers (existence of several groups of states with close energies) is proposed to reflect their equilibrium dynamics in membrane-mimics. The calculations performed for GpA mutants G83A and G86L permit rationalization of mutagenesis data for them. The results of Monte Carlo simulations critically depend on the parameters of the membrane model: adequate description of helix association is achieved in the water-cyclohexane-water system with the membrane thickness 30-34 A, while in membranes with different hydrophobicities and thickness unrealistic conformations of the dimer are found. The computational approach permits efficient prediction of TM helical oligomers based solely on the sequences of interacting peptides.

Citing Articles

Joint-based description of protein structure: its application to the geometric characterization of membrane proteins.

Thangappan J, Wu S, Lee S Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1056.

PMID: 28432363 PMC: 5430719. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01011-z.


Role of the Lipid Environment in the Dimerization of Transmembrane Domains of Glycophorin A.

Kuznetsov A, Volynsky P, Efremov R Acta Naturae. 2016; 7(4):122-7.

PMID: 26798499 PMC: 4717257.


Dynamics of the Glycophorin A Dimer in Membranes of Native-Like Composition Uncovered by Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Flinner N, Schleiff E PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0133999.

PMID: 26222139 PMC: 4519189. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133999.


Critical glycosylated residues in exon three of erythrocyte glycophorin A engage Plasmodium falciparum EBA-175 and define receptor specificity.

Salinas N, Paing M, Tolia N mBio. 2014; 5(5):e01606-14.

PMID: 25205096 PMC: 4173783. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01606-14.


Transferring the PRIMO Coarse-Grained Force Field to the Membrane Environment: Simulations of Membrane Proteins and Helix-Helix Association.

Kar P, Gopal S, Cheng Y, Panahi A, Feig M J Chem Theory Comput. 2014; 10(8):3459-3472.

PMID: 25136271 PMC: 4132866. DOI: 10.1021/ct500443v.


References
1.
Schlessinger J . Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2000; 103(2):211-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00114-8. View

2.
Vereshaga Y, Volynsky P, Nolde D, Arseniev A, Efremov R . Helix Interactions in Membranes:  Lessons from Unrestrained Monte Carlo Simulations. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015; 1(6):1252-64. DOI: 10.1021/ct0501250. View

3.
Biggin P, Sansom M . Interactions of alpha-helices with lipid bilayers: a review of simulation studies. Biophys Chem. 1999; 76(3):161-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(98)00233-6. View

4.
Melnyk R, Partridge A, Deber C . Transmembrane domain mediated self-assembly of major coat protein subunits from Ff bacteriophage. J Mol Biol. 2002; 315(1):63-72. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5214. View

5.
Pappu R, Marshall G, Ponder J . A potential smoothing algorithm accurately predicts transmembrane helix packing. Nat Struct Biol. 1999; 6(1):50-5. DOI: 10.1038/4922. View