» Articles » PMID: 16773076

Microvessel Density and VEGF Expression Are Prognostic Factors in Colorectal Cancer. Meta-analysis of the Literature

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2006 Jun 15
PMID 16773076
Citations 173
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies relating intratumoural microvessel density (MVD) (45 studies) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (27 studies), both reflecting angiogenesis, to relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC). For each study, MVD impact was measured by risk ratio between the two survival distributions with median MVD as cutoff. Eleven studies did not mention survival data or fit inclusion criteria, six were multiple publications of same series, leaving 32 independent studies for MVD (3496 patients) and 18 for VEGF (2050 patients). Microvessel density was assessed by immunohistochemistry, using antibodies against factor VIII (16 studies), CD31 (10 studies) or CD34 (seven studies). Vascular endothelial growth factor expression was mostly assessed by immunohistochemistry. Statistics were performed for MVD in 22 studies (the others lacking survival statistics) including nine studies (n = 957) for RFS and 18 for OS (n = 2383) and for VEGF in 17 studies, including nine studies for RFS (n = 1064) and 10 for OS (n = 1301). High MVD significantly predicted poor RFS (RR = 2.32 95% CI: 1.39-3.90; P < 0.001) and OS (RR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.08-1.92; P = 0.01). Using CD31 or CD34, MVD was inversely related to survival, whereas it was not using factor VIII. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression significantly predicted poor RFS (RR = 2.84; 95% CI: 1.95-4.16) and OS (RR=1.65; 95% CI: 1.27-2.14). To strengthen our findings, future prospective studies should explore the relation between MVD or VEGF expression and survival or response to therapy (e.g. antiangiogenic therapy). Assessment of these angiogenic markers should be better standardised in future studies.

Citing Articles

Pathophysiological role of histamine signaling and its implications in glioblastoma.

Yadav P, Vengoji R, Jain M, Batra S, Shonka N Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2024; 1879(5):189146.

PMID: 38955315 PMC: 11770814. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189146.


Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C and D Signaling Pathways as Potential Targets for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Narrative Review.

Leitch I, Gerometta M, Eichenbaum D, Finger R, Steinle N, Baldwin M Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(7):1857-1875.

PMID: 38824253 PMC: 11178757. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-00973-4.


Biomarkers for prognosis of meningioma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aung T, Ngamjarus C, Proungvitaya T, Saengboonmee C, Proungvitaya S PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303337.

PMID: 38758750 PMC: 11101050. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303337.


Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA): a novel histopathologic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients and its association with the luminal tumour proportion.

Reitsam N, Grosser B, Enke J, Mueller W, Westwood A, West N Transl Oncol. 2024; 44:101913.

PMID: 38593584 PMC: 11024380. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.101913.


The Potential Influence of Residual or Recurrent Disease on Bevacizumab Treatment Efficacy in Ovarian Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Zak K, Satora M, Skrabalak I, Tarkowski R, Ostrowska-Lesko M, Bobinski M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38473419 PMC: 10930956. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051063.


References
1.
Nanashima A, Ito M, Sekine I, Naito S, Yamaguchi H, Nakagoe T . Significance of angiogenic factors in liver metastatic tumors originating from colorectal cancers. Dig Dis Sci. 1999; 43(12):2634-40. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026643009152. View

2.
Choi H, Hyun M, Jung G, Kim S, Hong S . Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic predictor in colorectal carcinoma with special reference to mode of metastasis and recurrence. Oncology. 1998; 55(6):575-81. DOI: 10.1159/000011915. View

3.
Takahashi Y, Tucker S, Kitadai Y, Koura A, Bucana C, Cleary K . Vessel counts and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor as prognostic factors in node-negative colon cancer. Arch Surg. 1997; 132(5):541-6. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430290087018. View

4.
Ishigami S, Arii S, Furutani M, Niwano M, Harada T, Mizumoto M . Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in metastasis and prognosis of human colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998; 78(10):1379-84. PMC: 2063176. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.688. View

5.
van Triest B, Pinedo H, Blaauwgeers J, van Diest P, Schoenmakers P, Voorn D . Prognostic role of thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, and proliferation markers in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6(3):1063-72. View