» Articles » PMID: 16771656

On the Analysis and Interpretation of Inhomogeneous Quadratic Forms As Receptive Fields

Overview
Journal Neural Comput
Publisher MIT Press
Date 2006 Jun 15
PMID 16771656
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this letter, we introduce some mathematical and numerical tools to analyze and interpret inhomogeneous quadratic forms. The resulting characterization is in some aspects similar to that given by experimental studies of cortical cells, making it particularly suitable for application to second-order approximations and theoretical models of physiological receptive fields. We first discuss two ways of analyzing a quadratic form by visualizing the coefficients of its quadratic and linear term directly and by considering the eigenvectors of its quadratic term. We then present an algorithm to compute the optimal excitatory and inhibitory stimuli--those that maximize and minimize the considered quadratic form, respectively, given a fixed energy constraint. The analysis of the optimal stimuli is completed by considering their invariances, which are the transformations to which the quadratic form is most insensitive, and by introducing a test to determine which of these are statistically significant. Next we propose a way to measure the relative contribution of the quadratic and linear term to the total output of the quadratic form. Furthermore, we derive simpler versions of the above techniques in the special case of a quadratic form without linear term. In the final part of the letter, we show that for each quadratic form, it is possible to build an equivalent two-layer neural network, which is compatible with (but more general than) related networks used in some recent articles and with the energy model of complex cells. We show that the neural network is unique only up to an arbitrary orthogonal transformation of the excitatory and inhibitory subunits in the first layer.

Citing Articles

Toward understanding the role of genomic repeat elements in neurodegenerative diseases.

An Z, Jiang A, Chen J Neural Regen Res. 2024; 20(3):646-659.

PMID: 38886931 PMC: 11433896. DOI: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-23-01568.


Current progress and open challenges for applying deep learning across the biosciences.

Sapoval N, Aghazadeh A, Nute M, Antunes D, Balaji A, Baraniuk R Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1728.

PMID: 35365602 PMC: 8976012. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29268-7.


Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine.

Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Zatloukal K, Muller H Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2020; 9(4):e1312.

PMID: 32089788 PMC: 7017860. DOI: 10.1002/widm.1312.


Online stimulus optimization rapidly reveals multidimensional selectivity in auditory cortical neurons.

Chambers A, Hancock K, Sen K, Polley D J Neurosci. 2014; 34(27):8963-75.

PMID: 24990917 PMC: 4078078. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0260-14.2014.


Slow feature analysis on retinal waves leads to V1 complex cells.

Dahne S, Wilbert N, Wiskott L PLoS Comput Biol. 2014; 10(5):e1003564.

PMID: 24810948 PMC: 4014395. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003564.