» Articles » PMID: 16769550

Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2006 Jun 14
PMID 16769550
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The role of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for perforated appendicitis is under investigation. A retrospective study was conducted to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy (OA) for perforated appendicitis. From January 2001 through December 2003, 229 patients with perforated appendicitis were treated at Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital. LA was successfully completed in 91 of 99 patients. OA was performed in 130 patients. Operation time was longer in the LA group (mean +/- SD = 96.1 +/- 43.1 vs. 67.8 +/- 32.2 minutes, P < 0.01). Return of oral intake was faster in the LA group (3.2 +/- 2.4 vs. 5.0 +/- 7.0 days, P < 0.01). The intravenous antibiotic usage period was shorter in the LA group (4.4 +/- 2.8 vs. 6.3 +/- 7.1 days, P < 0.01). The postoperative wound infection rates were 15.2 % (LA group) and 30.7% (OA group). The overall infectious complication rates were 19% in the LA group and 37% in the OA group (P < 0.01). Hospital stay days were shorter for the LA group (6.3 +/- 2.9 vs. 9.3 +/- 8.6 days, P < 0.01). Our results indicated that laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and effective procedure for treating patients with perforated appendicitis.

Citing Articles

A Prospective and Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Open Appendectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Appendicitis.

Srivastava S, Yadav G, Shukla P, Verma S Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77631.

PMID: 39963643 PMC: 11832196. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77631.


Effect of peritoneal and wound lavage with super-oxidized solution on surgical-site infection after open appendicectomy in perforated appendicitis (PLaSSo): randomized clinical trial.

Sellappan H, Alagoo D, Loo C, Vijian K, Sibin R, Chuah J BJS Open. 2024; 8(5).

PMID: 39413050 PMC: 11482247. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae121.


The contemporary management of perforated appendicitis in adults: To operate or wait?.

Fitzgerald C, Kernell C, Mejia-Martinez V, Peng G, Zakaria H, Zhu M Surg Open Sci. 2024; 20:242-246.

PMID: 39156487 PMC: 11327589. DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.008.


Perforated appendicitis treated with laparoscopic appendicectomy or open appendicectomy: A meta-analysis.

Gu Q, Hua Y J Minim Access Surg. 2023; 19(3):348-354.

PMID: 37357489 PMC: 10449044. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_158_22.


Challenges to implement laparoscopic appendectomy as the first-line treatment for acute appendicitis: a fifteen-year experience in a tertiary hospital in Brazil.

Damous S, Menegozzo C, Rocha M, Collet-E-Silva F, Utiyama E Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023; 50:e20233527.

PMID: 37222347 PMC: 10508672. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233527-en.


References
1.
Wu J, Chen K, Lin H, Tseng L, Tseng S, Huang S . Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnancy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005; 15(5):447-50. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.447. View

2.
Senapathi P, Bhattacharya D, Ammori B . Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16(12):1783-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9232-1. View

3.
Yao C, Lin C, Yang C . Laparoscopic appendectomy for ruptured appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000; 9(4):271-3. View

4.
Ball C, Kortbeek J, Kirkpatrick A, Mitchell P . Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(6):969-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. View

5.
Frazee R, Roberts J, SYMMONDS R, Snyder S, Hendricks J, Smith R . A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1994; 219(6):725-8; discussion 728-31. PMC: 1243232. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00017. View