Risk Factors for Fragility Fracture in Middle Age. A Prospective Population-based Study of 33,000 Men and Women

Overview

Journal Osteoporos Int

Specialties Endocrinology
Orthopedics

Date 2006 Jun 8

PMID 16758143

Citations 93

Authors

A H Holmberg

O Johnell

P M Nilsson

J Nilsson

G Berglund

K Akesson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The incidence of fragility fractures begins to increase in middle age. We investigated prospectively risk factors for low-energy fractures in men and women, and specifically for forearm, proximal humerus, vertebral, and ankle fractures. The population-based Malmö Preventive Project consists of 22,444 men and 10,902 women, mean age 44 and 50 years, respectively, at inclusion. Baseline assessment included multiple examinations and lifestyle information. Mean follow-up was 19 and 15 years for men and women, respectively, regarding incident fractures. Fractures were ascertained from radiographic files. At least one low-energy fracture occurred in 1,262 men and 1,257 women. In men, the risk factors most strongly associated with low-energy fractures were diabetes [relative risk (RR) 2.38, confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.65-3.42] and hospitalization for mental health problems (RR 1.92, CI 95% 1.47-2.51). Factors associated with mental health and lifestyle significantly increased the fracture risk in most of the specific fracture groups: hospitalizations for mental health problems (RR 2.28-3.38), poor appetite (RR 3.05-3.43), sleep disturbances (RR 1.72-2.95), poor self-rated health (RR 1.80-1.83), and smoking (RR 1.70-2.72). In women, the risk factors most strongly associated with low-energy fractures were diabetes (RR 1.87, CI 95% 1.26-2.79) and previous fracture (RR 2.00, CI 95% 1.56-2.58). High body mass index (BMI) significantly increased the risk of proximal humerus and ankle fractures (RR 1.21-1.33) while, by contrast, lowering the risk of forearm fractures (RR 0.88, CI 95% 0.81-0.96). Risk factors for fracture in middle-aged men and women are similar but with gender differences for forearm, vertebral, proximal humerus, and hip fracture whereas risk factors for ankle fractures differ to a certain extent. The risk-factor pattern indicates a generally impaired health status, with mental health problems as a major contributor to fracture risk, particularly in men.

Citing Articles

Frequency of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the Kingdom of Bahrain.

Hassan A, Almarabheh A, Almekhyal A, Karashi A, Saleh J, Shaikh M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765942 PMC: 11675876. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242515.

Bone Mineral Density and Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fracture.

Kang H, Kim H, Lim C J Bone Metab. 2024; 31(3):228-235.

PMID: 39307523 PMC: 11416874. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2024.31.3.228.

Links among Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Osteoporosis: Bone as a Target.

Martiniakova M, Biro R, Penzes N, Sarocka A, Kovacova V, Mondockova V Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38732046 PMC: 11084398. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094827.

Application of machine learning algorithms to identify people with low bone density.

Xu R, Chen Y, Yao Z, Wu W, Cui J, Wang R Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1347219.

PMID: 38726233 PMC: 11080984. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347219.

The incidence of fractures at various sites in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sarodnik C, Rasmussen N, Bours S, Schaper N, Vestergaard P, Souverein P Bone Rep. 2022; 17:101614.

PMID: 36062034 PMC: 9437792. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101614.

References

Olsson C, Nordqvist A, Petersson C . Increased fragility in patients with fracture of the proximal humerus: a case control study. Bone. 2004; 34(6):1072-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.009. View

Nguyen T, Center J, Sambrook P, Eisman J . Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153(6):587-95. DOI: 10.1093/aje/153.6.587. View

Holmberg A, Johnell O, Akesson K, Nilsson P, Nilsson J, Berglund G . Forearm bone mineral density in 1294 middle-aged women: a strong predictor of fragility fractures. J Clin Densitom. 2004; 7(4):419-23. DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:4:419. View

Chu S, Kelsey J, Keegan T, Sternfeld B, Prill M, Quesenberry C . Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160(4):360-7. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh224. View

Sanders K, Seeman E, Ugoni A, Pasco J, Martin T, Skoric B . Age- and gender-specific rate of fractures in Australia: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int. 1999; 10(3):240-7. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050222. View

Melton 3rd L, Amadio P, Crowson C, OFallon W . Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1999; 8(4):341-8. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050073. View

Ottenbacher K, Ostir G, Peek M, Goodwin J, Markides K . Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for hip fracture in mexican american older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57(10):M648-53. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/57.10.m648. View

BANCIU T, Weidenfeld H, Marcoane E, BERINDE L . Serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase assay in the detection of alcohol consumers and in the early and stadial diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease. Med Interne. 1983; 21(1):23-9. View

Law M, Hackshaw A . A meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect. BMJ. 1997; 315(7112):841-6. PMC: 2127590. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7112.841. View

10.

Forsen L, Meyer H, Midthjell K, Edna T . Diabetes mellitus and the incidence of hip fracture: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Survey. Diabetologia. 1999; 42(8):920-5. DOI: 10.1007/s001250051248. View

11.

Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Saarikoski S, Alhava E . Risk factors for perimenopausal fractures: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(3):219-27. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050284. View

12.

Obrant K, Bengner U, Johnell O, NILSSON B, Sernbo I . Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations?. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989; 44(3):157-67. DOI: 10.1007/BF02556558. View

13.

Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis J, Allander E, Elffors L, Dequeker J . Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10(11):1802-15. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650101125. View

14.

Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L . Relative fracture risk in patients with diabetes mellitus, and the impact of insulin and oral antidiabetic medication on relative fracture risk. Diabetologia. 2005; 48(7):1292-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-005-1786-3. View

15.

Seeley D, Kelsey J, Jergas M, Nevitt M . Predictors of ankle and foot fractures in older women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11(9):1347-55. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650110920. View

16.

Valtola A, Honkanen R, Kroger H, Tuppurainen M, Saarikoski S, Alhava E . Lifestyle and other factors predict ankle fractures in perimenopausal women: a population-based prospective cohort study. Bone. 2002; 30(1):238-42. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00649-4. View

17.

Ahmed L, Joakimsen R, Berntsen G, Fonnebo V, Schirmer H . Diabetes mellitus and the risk of non-vertebral fractures: the Tromsø study. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 17(4):495-500. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0013-x. View

18.

Ahmed L, Schirmer H, Berntsen G, Fonnebo V, Joakimsen R . Self-reported diseases and the risk of non-vertebral fractures: the Tromsø study. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 17(1):46-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1892-6. View

19.

Yokoyama H, Moriya S, Homma Y, Ogawa T . Association between gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase activity and status of disorders constituting insulin resistance syndrome. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003; 27(8 Suppl):22S-25S. DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000078608.22813.D9. View

20.

Kanis J, Johnell O . Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 16(3):229-38. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1811-2. View