» Articles » PMID: 16741562

The Spatial Dynamics of Poliomyelitis in the United States: From Epidemic Emergence to Vaccine-Induced Retreat, 1910-1971

Overview
Date 2006 Jun 3
PMID 16741562
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article seeks to advance an understanding of the spatial dynamics of one of the great emergent viral diseases of the twentieth century-poliomyelitis. From an apparently rare clinical condition occurring only sporadically or in small outbreaks before the late nineteenth century, poliomyelitis had, by the early 1950s, developed into a globally distributed epidemic disease. But, from 1955, continued growth was suddenly and dramatically reversed by the mass administration of inactivated (killed) and live (attenuated) poliovirus vaccines. After almost half a century of vaccine control, the world now stands on the brink of the global eradication of the disease. Against this background, the article draws upon information included in the U.S. Public Health Service's Public Health Reports and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report to examine the spatial dynamics of poliomyelitis during the phases of epidemic emergence (1910-1955) and vaccine-induced retreat (1955-1971) in the United States. It is shown that epidemic emergence was accompanied by shifts in the spatial center of activity from early diffusion poles in the northeastern states, to the western seaboard, and then finally to cover all the states of the Union. This was accompanied by accelerating epidemic propagation. The introduction of mass vaccination from the mid-1950s realigned spatial transmission of the disease, producing increased spatial volatility in the geographical center of activity and heightened dependence of epidemic outbreaks upon endemic reservoirs in the most populous states. Finally, the empirical results are generalized to suggest that the emergence and reemergence of many infectious diseases is a distinctively geographical process.

Citing Articles

Polio Survivors' Experiences of Acute Phase Care After the Isolation Phase in the 1950s and 1960s in Finland.

Elomaa-Krapu M, Kaunonen M Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024; 11:23333936241303730.

PMID: 39619688 PMC: 11607756. DOI: 10.1177/23333936241303730.


The history of polio vaccination with "Sabin's OPV" 60 years after its introduction in Italy: an unforgivable "delay".

Orsini D, Valchi L, Minet C, Martini M J Prev Med Hyg. 2024; 65(1):E105-E112.

PMID: 38706758 PMC: 11066819. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.1.3242.


Could live attenuated vaccines better control COVID-19?.

Okamura S, Ebina H Vaccine. 2021; 39(39):5719-5726.

PMID: 34426024 PMC: 8354792. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.018.


Can pandemics affect educational attainment? Evidence from the polio epidemic of 1916.

Meyers K, Thomasson M Cliometrica (Berl). 2020; 15(2):231-265.

PMID: 32837578 PMC: 7384283. DOI: 10.1007/s11698-020-00212-3.


Were there long-term economic effects of exposure to polio vaccination? An analysis of migrants to Sweden 1946-2003.

Serratos-Sotelo L SSM Popul Health. 2020; 11:100589.

PMID: 32577493 PMC: 7305338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100589.


References
1.
Swennen B, Levy J . Oral poliomyelitis vaccine: time to change?. Vaccine. 2001; 19(17-19):2262-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00549-1. View

2.
Cliff A, Haggett P . Methods for the measurement of epidemic velocity from time-series data. Int J Epidemiol. 1982; 11(1):82-9. DOI: 10.1093/ije/11.1.82. View

3.
Sabin A . Oral poliovirus vaccine: history of its development and use and current challenge to eliminate poliomyelitis from the world. J Infect Dis. 1985; 151(3):420-36. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/151.3.420. View

4.
GILLIAM A, HEMPHILL F, GERENDE J . Poliomyelitis epidemic recurrence in the counties of the United States, 1932-1946. Public Health Rep (1896). 1949; 64(49):1584-95. View

5.
NATHANSON N, Martin J . The epidemiology of poliomyelitis: enigmas surrounding its appearance, epidemicity, and disappearance. Am J Epidemiol. 1979; 110(6):672-92. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112848. View