» Articles » PMID: 16738976

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2006 Jun 2
PMID 16738976
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy among the elderly.

Methods: Data on 53 elderly patients with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 24 had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and 29 had undergone open appendectomy (OA). The indications for either method were based on the patient's choice.

Results: No statistically significant difference in operative time was found between the LA (70 +/- 28 min) and OA (60 +/- 22 min) groups. There was no statistically significant difference in lengths of hospital stay between the LA (4.8 +/- 3.0 days) and OA (5.0 +/- 3.1 days) groups, and there was a statistically significant difference in the postoperative analgesic doses between the LA (0.5 +/- 0.3 doses) and OA (1.7 +/- 1.5 doses) groups. No conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery was necessary, and no intraabdominal abscesses developed.

Conclusion: According to this study, LA is as safe and effective as OA for the elderly. Furthermore, it significantly reduces postoperative wound pain.

Citing Articles

EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.

Keller D, Curtis N, Burt H, Ammirati C, Collings A, Polk Jr H Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4104-4126.

PMID: 38942944 PMC: 11289045. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7.


The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part II.

Sobocki J, Pedziwiatr M, Bigda J, Holowko W, Major P, Mitura K Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023; 18(3):379-400.

PMID: 37868279 PMC: 10585467. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.127884.


Laparoscopy versus open appendectomy for elderly patients, a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Wang D, Dong T, Shao Y, Gu T, Xu Y, Jiang Y BMC Surg. 2019; 19(1):54.

PMID: 31138196 PMC: 6540400. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0515-7.


Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015.

Gorter R, Eker H, Gorter-Stam M, Abis G, Acharya A, Ankersmit M Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(11):4668-4690.

PMID: 27660247 PMC: 5082605. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7.


Acute appendicitis: position paper, WSES, 2013.

Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Catena F, Verza L, Prando D World J Emerg Surg. 2014; 9(1):26.

PMID: 24708651 PMC: 3984433. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-26.


References
1.
Lau W, Fan S, Yiu T, Chu K, Lee J . Acute appendicitis in the elderly. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985; 161(2):157-60. View

2.
Hardin Jr D . Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician. 1999; 60(7):2027-34. View

3.
Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F, Klein S, Stamos M . Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency?. Am Surg. 1998; 64(10):970-5. View

4.
Franz M, Norman J, Fabri P . Increased morbidity of appendicitis with advancing age. Am Surg. 1995; 61(1):40-4. View

5.
Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E, Castellano P, Pelosio L, Imperatore V . Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(5):477-83. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000343. View