» Articles » PMID: 16702296

Dairy Cattle Culling Patterns, Explanations, and Implications

Overview
Journal J Dairy Sci
Date 2006 May 17
PMID 16702296
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Culling patterns in the Upper Midwest and Northeast regions were examined from Dairy Herd Improvement records from 1993 through 1999. There were 7,087,699 individual cow lactation observations of which 1,458,936 were complete. A probit regression model was used to determine how individual cow and herd characteristics affected the likelihood of a cow being culled. The model predicted whether individual cows were culled each month. With a combination of observable cow and herd characteristics, as well as variables to capture state, year, and farm effects, the model was able to explain, with a 79.5 and 79.9% accuracy rate, individual cow cull decisions in the Upper Midwest and Northeast regions, respectively. Summer (- 11.5% in the Upper Midwest; - 6.4% in the Northeast) and fall (- 18.7% in the Upper Midwest; - 7.9% in the Northeast) calving vs. spring calving, higher than average milk production (- 1.7% per hundredweight in the Upper Midwest; - 0.5% in the Northeast), higher than average protein content (- 0.2% per additional percentage milk protein in the Upper Midwest; - 0.1% in the Northeast), higher milk production persistency (- 2.1% per additional percent persistent in the Upper Midwest; - 1.8% in the Northeast), and expansion (during the early years following the expansion) were associated with a reduced likelihood of a cow being culled. Lower than average fat content (0.04% per additional percentage butterfat in the Upper Midwest; 0.02% in the Northeast), and higher than average somatic cell count (8.8% for each unit increase in somatic cell count score in the Upper Midwest; 7.8% in the Northeast) were associated with an increased likelihood of a cow being culled. The study results are useful in describing patterns of culling and relating them to cow, herd, geographic, and time variables and can act as a benchmark for producers.

Citing Articles

The role of milk urea nitrogen in nutritional assessment and its relationship with phenotype of dairy cows: A review.

Zhao X, Zheng N, Zhang Y, Wang J Anim Nutr. 2025; 20:33-41.

PMID: 39949732 PMC: 11821394. DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.08.007.


Reproductive traits and economic aspects on dairy cattle.

Dos Santos J, de Freitas B, Obando I, de Oliveira N, Penitente-Filho J, Moreira M Anim Reprod. 2025; 22(1):e20240050.

PMID: 39916774 PMC: 11801145. DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2024-0050.


Milk sustainability in specialized farms as affected by farm size and culling rates: A new perspective for allocation.

Bragaglio A, Nannoni E, Romano E, Lazzari A, Roma R, Bisaglia C Vet Anim Sci. 2025; 27:100426.

PMID: 39886459 PMC: 11780153. DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2025.100426.


Uterine Disease in Dairy Cows: A Comprehensive Review Highlighting New Research Areas.

Varhidi Z, Csiko G, Bajcsy A, Jurkovich V Vet Sci. 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38393084 PMC: 10893454. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11020066.


Milk recording data indicates the importance of fertility, including age at first calving, on the progression of first lactation cows to second lactation.

Taylor E, Channa K, Hanks J, Taylor N PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0297657.

PMID: 38285711 PMC: 10824451. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297657.