Attitudes Toward Financial Incentives, Donor Authorization, and Presumed Consent Among Next-of-kin Who Consented Vs. Refused Organ Donation

Overview

Journal Transplantation

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2006 May 16

PMID 16699449

Citations 9

Authors

James R Rodrigue

Danielle L Cornell

Richard J Howard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent are strategies designed to increase organ donation rates. Surveys designed to assess attitudes toward these initiatives have been conducted with the general public, transplant patients, and transplant professionals.

Methods: To assess attitudes toward financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent and to identify multivariate predictors of such attitudes, we conducted telephone interviews with 561 family members who had recently been asked for consent to donate the organs of a deceased family member (348 donors, 213 nondonors).

Results: Financial incentives would have made a difference in the donation decision for 54% of nondonors (vs. 46% of donors, P=0.02), and a higher percentage of nondonors would themselves become donors if financial incentives were available (P=0.03). Donors had significantly more favorable attitudes toward donor authorization (P<0.0001) and presumed consent (P<0.0001) policies. Overall, 54% of participants thought that family permission for donation was unnecessary when the deceased documented their donation intention, and 24% favored a presumed consent law with an opting out provision.

Conclusions: Of the three initiatives, donor authorization is likely supported by more donor and nondonor families than either financial incentives or presumed consent. Public education efforts should aim to better inform the public regarding existing and proposed donor authorization legislation and its benefits for registered organ donors and their families.

Citing Articles

Views on deceased organ donation in the Netherlands: A q-methodology study.

Truijens D, van Exel J PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0216479.

PMID: 31125339 PMC: 6534345. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216479.

Canadian Guidelines for Controlled Pediatric Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death-Summary Report.

Weiss M, Hornby L, Rochwerg B, van Manen M, Dhanani S, Ben Sivarajan V Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017; 18(11):1035-1046.

PMID: 28925929 PMC: 5671796. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001320.

Pro-donation behaviours of nursing students from the four countries of the UK.

McGlade D, McClenahan C, Pierscionek B PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e91405.

PMID: 24614807 PMC: 3948850. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091405.

Can education alter attitudes, behaviour and knowledge about organ donation? A pretest-post-test study.

McGlade D, Pierscionek B BMJ Open. 2014; 3(12):e003961.

PMID: 24381257 PMC: 3884632. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003961.

Factors encouraging and inhibiting organ donation in Israel: the public view and the contribution of legislation and public policy.

Sperling D, Gurman G J Bioeth Inq. 2012; 9(4):479-97.

PMID: 23188407 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-012-9398-3.

References

Shafer T, Davis K, Holtzman S, Van Buren C, Crafts N, Durand R . Location of in-house organ procurement organization staff in level I trauma centers increases conversion of potential donors to actual donors. Transplantation. 2003; 75(8):1330-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000060532.70301.32. View

DeJong W, Franz H, Wolfe S, Nathan H, Payne D, Reitsma W . Requesting organ donation: an interview study of donor and nondonor families. Am J Crit Care. 1998; 7(1):13-23. View

Roels L, De Meester J . The relative impact of presumed-consent legislation on thoracic organ donation in the Eurotransplant area. J Transpl Coord. 1996; 6(4):174-7. DOI: 10.7182/prtr.1.6.4.24130m75305r1348. View

Johnson E, Goldstein D . Medicine. Do defaults save lives?. Science. 2003; 302(5649):1338-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091721. View

Gnant M, Wamser P, Goetzinger P, Sautner T, Steininger R, Muehlbacher F . The impact of the presumed consent law and a decentralized organ procurement system on organ donation: quadruplication in the number of organ donors. Transplant Proc. 1991; 23(5):2685-6. View

Jasper J, Nickerson C, Ubel P, Asch D . Altruism, incentives, and organ donation: attitudes of the transplant community. Med Care. 2004; 42(4):378-86. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000118863.47574.0f. View

Burroughs T, Hong B, Kappel D, Freedman B . The stability of family decisions to consent or refuse organ donation: would you do it again?. Psychosom Med. 1998; 60(2):156-62. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199803000-00007. View

Kittur D, Hogan M, Thukral V, McGaw L, Alexander J . Incentives for organ donation? The United Network for Organ Sharing Ad Hoc Donations Committee. Lancet. 1991; 338(8780):1441-3. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92735-k. View

Evans J . Commodifying life? A pilot study of opinions regarding financial incentives for organ donation. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2004; 28(6):1003-32. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-28-6-1003. View

10.

Peters T . Life or death. The issue of payment in cadaveric organ donation. JAMA. 1991; 265(10):1302-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.265.10.1302. View

11.

Callender C, Hall M, Branch D . An assessment of the effectiveness of the Mottep model for increasing donation rates and preventing the need for transplantation--adult findings: program years 1998 and 1999. Semin Nephrol. 2001; 21(4):419-28. DOI: 10.1053/snep.2001.23778. View

12.

Roels L, Vanrenterghem Y, Waer M, Christiaens M, Gruwez J, Michielsen P . Three years of experience with a 'presumed consent' legislation in Belgium: its impact on multi-organ donation in comparison with other European countries. The Leuven Collaborative Group for Transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1991; 23(1 Pt 2):903-4. View

13.

Kishore R . Human organs, scarcities, and sale: morality revisited. J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(6):362-5. PMC: 1734170. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.009621. View

14.

Siminoff L, Leonard M . Financial incentives: alternatives to the altruistic model of organ donation. J Transpl Coord. 2000; 9(4):250-6. DOI: 10.7182/prtr.1.9.4.g5070676r738l7lq. View

15.

Sehgal A, LeBeau S, Youngner S . Dialysis patient attitudes toward financial incentives for kidney donation. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997; 29(3):410-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90203-1. View

16.

Siminoff L, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold R . Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA. 2001; 286(1):71-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.1.71. View

17.

Sheehy E, Conrad S, Brigham L, Luskin R, Weber P, Eakin M . Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(7):667-74. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa021271. View

18.

Gimbel R, Strosberg M, Lehrman S, Gefenas E, Taft F . Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. Prog Transplant. 2003; 13(1):17-23. DOI: 10.1177/152692480301300104. View

19.

Radecki C, Jaccard J . Psychological aspects of organ donation: a critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol. 1997; 16(2):183-95. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.183. View

20.

Oz M, Kherani A, Rowe A, Roels L, Crandall C, Tomatis L . How to improve organ donation: results of the ISHLT/FACT poll. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003; 22(4):389-410. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(03)00074-3. View