» Articles » PMID: 16698950

Value of Ezrin, Maspin and Nm23-H1 Protein Expressions in Predicting Outcome of Patients with Head and Neck Squamous-cell Carcinoma Treated with Radical Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal J Clin Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2006 May 16
PMID 16698950
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Prognostic factors in predicting outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are limited to the clinical-pathological parameters, including lymph node metastasis, location, grade and stage of the disease.

Aim: To determine whether the expression of these proteins has a value in predicting patient outcome.

Methods: Ezrin, maspin and nm23-H1 immunohistochemistry in tissue samples of 120 patients with HNSCC were evaluated using the microarray technique.

Results: In determining the association among each of the three proteins and the clinical-pathological parameters, low maspin expression was the only one found to be significantly associated with high tumour grade (p = 0.007); all others showed no significant associations. In univariate analysis, patients with tumours expressing high ezrin had a shorter disease-free survival (DFS) of 51% than those with low ezrin expression (DFS 84%; p = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, tumours with the combination of loss of maspin and low histological grade had longer DFS (83%) compared with those with high maspin and high histological grade (DFS 42%; p = 0.08).

Conclusion: Our study is the first to determine the value of ezrin and maspin in HNSCC in a large series of patients with long follow-up. Ezrin and maspin seem to have a potential prognostic value in patients with HNSCC but results should be confirmed with further studies.

Citing Articles

Podoplanin, ezrin, and Rho-A proteins may have joint participation in tumor invasion of lip cancer.

Assao A, Nonogaki S, Lauris J, Carvalho A, Pinto C, Soares F Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 21(5):1647-1657.

PMID: 27628318 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1956-3.


Prognostic Value of Ezrin in Various Cancers: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-analysis.

Li J, Wei K, Yu H, Jin D, Wang G, Yu B Sci Rep. 2015; 5:17903.

PMID: 26632332 PMC: 4668575. DOI: 10.1038/srep17903.


A five-variable signature predicts radioresistance and prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving radical radiotherapy.

Yi H, Yi H, Zhu J, Xiao T, Lu S, Guan Y Tumour Biol. 2015; 37(3):2941-9.

PMID: 26409455 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4139-y.


Are podoplanin and ezrin involved in the invasion process of the ameloblastomas?.

Costa Y, Tjioe K, Nonogaki S, Soares F, Lauris J, Oliveira D Eur J Histochem. 2015; 59(1):2451.

PMID: 25820557 PMC: 4378211. DOI: 10.4081/ejh.2015.2451.


The relationship between ezrin and podoplanin expressions in keratocystic odontogenic tumors.

Oliveira D, Santis L, Assao A, Tjioe K, Nonogaki S, Lauris J BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:150.

PMID: 25480364 PMC: 4271494. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-150.


References
1.
Pera E, Moreno A, Galindo L . Prognostic factors in laryngeal carcinoma. A multifactorial study of 416 cases. Cancer. 1986; 58(4):928-34. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860815)58:4<928::aid-cncr2820580421>3.0.co;2-j. View

2.
Allal A, Dulguerov P, Bieri S, Lehmann W, Kurtz J . A conservation approach to pharyngeal carcinoma with advanced neck disease: optimizing neck management. Head Neck. 1999; 21(3):217-22. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199905)21:3<217::aid-hed6>3.0.co;2-s. View

3.
Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S . Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med. 1998; 4(7):844-7. DOI: 10.1038/nm0798-844. View

4.
Hanna E, Shrieve D, Ratanatharathorn V, Xia X, Breau R, Suen J . A novel alternative approach for prediction of radiation response of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Cancer Res. 2001; 61(6):2376-80. View

5.
Gunduz M, Ayhan A, Gullu I, Onerci M, Hosal A, Gursel B . nm23 Protein expression in larynx cancer and the relationship with metastasis. Eur J Cancer. 1998; 33(14):2338-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00321-3. View