» Articles » PMID: 16689989

Issues of Informed Consent for Intrapartum Trials: a Suggested Consent Pathway from the Experience of the Release Trial [ISRCTN13204258]

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2006 May 13
PMID 16689989
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Service users within the NHS are increasingly being asked to participate in clinical research. In Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, approximately 35% of women take part in research during their pregnancy. For many studies the consent process is simple; information is provided and signed consent is given. There is a difficulty, however, with obtaining informed consent from women in pregnancy who become eligible only when they develop unforeseen complications, especially when they occur acutely. The problem is compounded with women in labour who may be frightened, vulnerable, in pain, under the effect of opiate analgesia, or all of the above. If research to improve the care of these women is to continue, then special consent procedures are needed. These procedures must ensure that the woman's autonomy is protected whilst recognising that women under these circumstances vary enormously, both in their desire for information and their ability to comprehend it. This paper will discuss the obtaining of consent in this situation, and describe an information and consent pathway for intrapartum research which has been developed in collaboration with consumer groups as a way in which these issues can be tackled.

Citing Articles

Emergency Verbal Consent for Intrapartum Research: A Grounded Theory Study.

Bedwell C, Taylor W, Cunningham C, Weeks A, Lavender D BJOG. 2024; 132(4):446-453.

PMID: 39511861 PMC: 11794058. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17997.


Maternity healthcare professionals' experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study.

Hardman K, Davies A, Demetri A, Clayton G, Bakhbakhi D, Birchenall K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e080961.

PMID: 38684269 PMC: 11057275. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080961.


Questioning approaches to consent in time critical obstetric trials: findings from a mixed-methods study.

Deja E, Weeks A, Van Netten C, Gamble C, Meher S, Gyte G BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e081874.

PMID: 38341214 PMC: 10862288. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081874.


Women's and midwives' views on the optimum process for informed consent for research in a feasibility study involving an intrapartum intervention: a qualitative study.

Alvarez M, Hotton E, Harding S, Ives J, Crofts J, Wade J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):98.

PMID: 37322539 PMC: 10268483. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01330-1.


Complex and alternate consent pathways in clinical trials: methodological and ethical challenges encountered by underserved groups and a call to action.

Russell A, Shepherd V, Woolfall K, Young B, Gillies K, Volkmer A Trials. 2023; 24(1):151.

PMID: 36855178 PMC: 9973248. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07159-6.


References
1.
Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, VanDenKerkhof E, Milne B . Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know. Can J Anaesth. 2000; 47(11):1068-73. DOI: 10.1007/BF03027957. View

2.
. The CRASH trial protocol (Corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury) [ISRCTN74459797]. BMC Emerg Med. 2001; 1(1):1. PMC: 33506. DOI: 10.1186/1471-227x-1-1. View

3.
Affleck P, Waisel D, Cusick J, Van Decar T . Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth. 1998; 10(2):141-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00258-4. View

4.
Wald D . Bureaucracy of ethics applications. BMJ. 2004; 329(7460):282-4. PMC: 498035. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.282. View

5.
Lavender T, Walkinshaw S, Walton I . A prospective study of women's views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery. 1999; 15(1):40-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(99)90036-0. View