» Articles » PMID: 16685086

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft: 5- to 9-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2006 May 11
PMID 16685086
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The results of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are limited in the current literature, and no studies have previously documented the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using solely hamstring tendon grafts.

Hypothesis: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon graft affords acceptable results and is comparable to reported outcomes with the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: Fifty-seven consecutive revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with the hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation were assessed a mean time of 89 months (range, 60-109 months) after surgery. Assessment included the International Knee Documentation Committee knee ligament evaluation, instrumented laxity testing, and radiologic examination.

Results: Of the 50 knees reviewed, 5 (10%) had objective failure of the revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Of the 45 patients with functional grafts, knee function was normal or nearly normal in 33 patients (73%). An overall grade of normal or nearly normal was found in 56% of patients. The mean side-to-side difference on manual maximum testing was 2.5 mm (range, -1 to 4 mm). Degenerative changes on radiographs were identified in 23% of patients at the time of surgery, increasing to 56% of patients at review. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of revision surgery was the most significant contributor to successful outcome.

Conclusion: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft and interference screw fixation affords acceptable results at a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Good objective results can be obtained, but subjectively, the results appear inferior to those of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the literature, which may be related to the high incidence of articular surface damage in this patient population. We recommend that, when available, hamstring tendon autografts should be considered for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Mode of injury and level of synovitis alter inflammatory chondrocyte gene expression and associated pathways.

Libke M, Cunningham D, Furman B, Yi J, Brunger J, Kraus V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28917.

PMID: 39572571 PMC: 11582678. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71964-5.


Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcome 6 Years After Revision ACL Reconstruction.

Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Pennings J, Allen C, Cooper D Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(13):3286-3294.

PMID: 39503722 PMC: 11796288. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241288227.


Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the ipsilateral Quadriceps tendon autograft: a modular reconstructive option.

Abouheif M, Sharaby M Int Orthop. 2023; 47(12):2967-2976.

PMID: 37540275 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05878-8.


Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Outcome After Revision ACL Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Cohort Study.

Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Pennings J, Allen C, Cooper D Am J Sports Med. 2023; 51(3):605-614.

PMID: 36734487 PMC: 10338044. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231151389.


Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li X, Yan L, Li D, Fan Z, Liu H, Wang G Int Orthop. 2023; 47(3):719-734.

PMID: 36642768 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05687-z.