» Articles » PMID: 16666020

Photoperiodic and Genetic Control of Carbon Partitioning in Peas and Its Relationship to Apical Senescence

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1988 Mar 1
PMID 16666020
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Apical senescence but not flower initiation is delayed by short days (SD) compared to long days (LD) in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) of genotype E Sn Hr. We recently reported that delay of senescence correlated with slower reproductive development, suggesting that fruits are weaker sinks for assimilates under delayed senescence conditions. Thus, we have examined assimilate partitioning in peas to determine if genotype and photoperiod regulate relative sink strength. Assimilate diversion by developing fruit has been implicated in senescence induction. A greater percentage of leaf-exported (14)C was transported to fruits and a smaller percentage to the apical bud of G2 peas (genotype E Sn Hr) in LD than in SD. Relatively more of the (14)C delivered to the apical bud of G2 peas was transported to flower buds than to young leaves in LD as compared to SD. There was no striking photoperiodic difference in carbon partitioning in genetic lines without the Sn Hr allele combination. The Sn Hr allele combination and photoperiod may regulate the relative strength of reproductive and vegetative sinks. Photoperiodic differences in sink strength early in reproduction suggest that these genes regulate sink strength by affecting the physiology of the whole plant. High vegetative sink strength in SD may maintain assimilate supply to the apical bud, delaying senescence.

Citing Articles

Genome-wide expression analysis of vegetative organs during developmental and herbicide-induced whole plant senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Chen P, Nguyen T, Lee R, Hsu T, Kao M, Gojobori T BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):621.

PMID: 38898417 PMC: 11188203. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10518-5.


Flowering also has to end: knowns and unknowns of reproductive arrest in monocarpic plants.

Balanza V, Merelo P, Ferrandiz C J Exp Bot. 2023; 74(14):3951-3960.

PMID: 37280109 PMC: 10400124. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad213.


Senescence: The Compromised Time of Death That Plants May Call on Themselves.

Miryeganeh M Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(2).

PMID: 33499161 PMC: 7912376. DOI: 10.3390/genes12020143.


Inflorescence Meristem Fate Is Dependent on Seed Development and FRUITFULL in .

Balanza V, Martinez-Fernandez I, Sato S, Yanofsky M, Ferrandiz C Front Plant Sci. 2020; 10:1622.

PMID: 31921264 PMC: 6930240. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01622.


A whole-system reconsideration of paradigms about photoperiod and temperature control of crop yield.

Wallace D, Zobel R, Yourstone K Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 86(1):17-26.

PMID: 24193379 DOI: 10.1007/BF00223804.


References
1.
Wareing P, Seth A . Ageing and senescence in the whole plant. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1967; 21:543-58. View

2.
Chatterton N, Silvius J . Photosynthate Partitioning into Starch in Soybean Leaves: I. Effects of Photoperiod versus Photosynthetic Period Duration. Plant Physiol. 1979; 64(5):749-53. PMC: 543353. DOI: 10.1104/pp.64.5.749. View

3.
Carr D, Pate J . Ageing in the whole plant. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1967; 21:559-99. View

4.
Proebsting W, Davies P, Marx G . Photoperiodic control of apical senescence in a genetic line of peas. Plant Physiol. 1976; 58(6):800-2. PMC: 542313. DOI: 10.1104/pp.58.6.800. View

5.
Leopold A, Niedergang-Kamien E, Janick J . Experimental Modification of Plant Senescence. Plant Physiol. 1959; 34(5):570-3. PMC: 541254. DOI: 10.1104/pp.34.5.570. View