» Articles » PMID: 16665984

Role of Carbohydrates in Diurnal Chilling Sensitivity of Tomato Seedlings

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1988 Mar 1
PMID 16665984
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tomato seedlings (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) chilled starting at different times during the light/dark cycle were most chilling-sensitive at the end of the dark period (AI King, MS Reid, BD Patterson 1982 Plant Physiol 70: 211-214). Low-temperature tolerance was regained with as little as 10 minutes of light exposure. Low light intensities were less effective than high light intensities in reducing sensitivity, and the length of exposure to light directly influenced sensitivity. Seedlings kept at low night temperatures prior to chilling were also less injured following chilling. Light also restored chilling tolerance to seedlings whose roots were removed. Supplying cut shoots with sucrose, glucose, or fructose reduced chilling sensitivity and largely eliminated the diurnal difference in sensitivity. Endogenous carbohydrate content was correlated with changes in chilling sensitivity; starch and sugar content fell markedly during the dark period. Increased concentrations of sugars were detected 15 minutes after the start of the light period. This evidence all suggests that changes in chilling sensitivity over the diurnal period are regulated by the light cycle. It also suggests that increased sensitivity at the end of the dark period could be due to carbohydrate depletion, and that chilling tolerance following light exposure is likely due to carbohydrate accumulation or closely related events.

Citing Articles

Photosynthetic limitation as a factor influencing yield in highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum) grown in a northern European environment.

Petridis A, van der Kaay J, Chrysanthou E, McCallum S, Graham J, Hancock R J Exp Bot. 2018; 69(12):3069-3080.

PMID: 29590429 PMC: 5972668. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery118.


Changes in SBPase activity influence photosynthetic capacity, growth, and tolerance to chilling stress in transgenic tomato plants.

Ding F, Wang M, Zhang S, Ai X Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32741.

PMID: 27586456 PMC: 5009361. DOI: 10.1038/srep32741.


Factors influencing the capacity for photosynthetic carbon assimilation in barley leaves at low temperatures.

Labate C, Leegood R Planta. 2013; 182(4):492-500.

PMID: 24197368 DOI: 10.1007/BF02341023.


Relationships between circadian rhythm of chilling resistance and acclimation to chilling in cotton seedlings.

McMillan K, Rikin A Planta. 2013; 182(3):455-60.

PMID: 24197198 DOI: 10.1007/BF02411399.


Long-term chilling of young tomato plants under low light and subsequent recovery : I. Growth, development and photosynthesis.

Bruggemann W, van der Kooij T, Van Hasselt P Planta. 2013; 186(2):172-8.

PMID: 24186656 DOI: 10.1007/BF00196246.


References
1.
King A, Reid M, Patterson B . Diurnal changes in the chilling sensitivity of seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1982; 70(1):211-4. PMC: 1067114. DOI: 10.1104/pp.70.1.211. View

2.
Stewart J, Guinn G . Chilling injury and changes in adenosine triphosphate of cotton seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1969; 44(4):605-8. PMC: 396132. DOI: 10.1104/pp.44.4.605. View

3.
Taylor A, Jepsen N, Christeller J . Plants under Climatic Stress: III. Low Temperature, High Light Effects on Photosynthetic Products. Plant Physiol. 1972; 49(5):798-802. PMC: 366055. DOI: 10.1104/pp.49.5.798. View

4.
Taylor A, Rowley J . Plants under Climatic Stress: I. Low Temperature, High Light Effects on Photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1971; 47(5):713-8. PMC: 396757. DOI: 10.1104/pp.47.5.713. View

5.
Rufty T, Kerr P, Huber S . Characterization of diurnal changes in activities of enzymes involved in sucrose biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1983; 73(2):428-33. PMC: 1066478. DOI: 10.1104/pp.73.2.428. View