» Articles » PMID: 16661878

Kinetics of Adaptation to Osmotic Stress in Lentil (Lens Culinaris Med.) Roots

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1981 Jul 1
PMID 16661878
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When intact roots of lentil (Lens culinaris Med.) are subjected to severe osmotic stress by treatment with a solution of low water potential, they immediately begin to shrink. Within 10 to 15 minutes, shrinkage ceases, and within 20 minutes, the roots resume growth. The time lag between application of osmoticum and resumption of growth varies from about 10 to 30 minutes over the range of external water potentials of -2 to -12.4 bars. For external water potentials as low as -8.7 bars the new steady rate of growth in the presence of osmoticum is approximately equal to that prevailing before application of osmoticum. For external water potentials between -8.7 and -13 bars growth resumes, but the new rate is less than that prior to addition of osmoticum. Measurements of changes in the internal solute content during adaptation show that the solute content of the root increases but that the magnitude of the increase is, by itself, insufficient to account for the resumption of rapid growth.

Citing Articles

EXPA6 Facilitates Radial and Longitudinal Transport of Na under Salt Stress.

Liu Z, Yin K, Zhang Y, Yan C, Zhao Z, Li J Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273303 PMC: 11395417. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179354.


Not so hidden anymore: Advances and challenges in understanding root growth under water deficits.

Voothuluru P, Wu Y, Sharp R Plant Cell. 2024; 36(5):1377-1409.

PMID: 38382086 PMC: 11062450. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae055.


Spatial distribution of turgor and root growth at low water potentials.

Spollen W, Sharp R Plant Physiol. 1991; 96(2):438-43.

PMID: 16668205 PMC: 1080789. DOI: 10.1104/pp.96.2.438.


Water Relations of Growing Maize Coleoptiles : Comparison between Mannitol and Polyethylene Glycol 6000 as External Osmotica for Adjusting Turgor Pressure.

Hohl M, Schopfer P Plant Physiol. 1991; 95(3):716-22.

PMID: 16668045 PMC: 1077597. DOI: 10.1104/pp.95.3.716.


Dynamic Relation between Expansion and Cellular Turgor in Growing Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Leaves.

Shackel K, Matthews M, Morrison J Plant Physiol. 1987; 84(4):1166-71.

PMID: 16665579 PMC: 1056746. DOI: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1166.


References
1.
Green P, ERICKSON R, Buggy J . Metabolic and physical control of cell elongation rate: in vivo studies in nitella. Plant Physiol. 1971; 47(3):423-30. PMC: 365882. DOI: 10.1104/pp.47.3.423. View

2.
Green P . Growth Physics in Nitella: a Method for Continuous in Vivo Analysis of Extensibility Based on a Micro-manometer Technique for Turgor Pressure. Plant Physiol. 1968; 43(8):1169-84. PMC: 1086993. DOI: 10.1104/pp.43.8.1169. View

3.
Boyer J . Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. Plant Physiol. 1968; 43(7):1056-62. PMC: 1086972. DOI: 10.1104/pp.43.7.1056. View

4.
Green P, Cummins W . Growth rate and turgor pressure: auxin effect studies with an automated apparatus for single coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 1974; 54(6):863-9. PMC: 366624. DOI: 10.1104/pp.54.6.863. View

5.
Hsiao T, Acevedo E, Henderson D . Maize leaf elongation: continuous measurements and close dependence on plant water status. Science. 1970; 168(3931):590-1. DOI: 10.1126/science.168.3931.590. View