» Articles » PMID: 16661718

Rapid Suppression of Growth by Blue Light: OCCURRENCE, TIME COURSE, AND GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

Overview
Journal Plant Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1981 Mar 1
PMID 16661718
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The inhibition of stem elongation in dark-grown seedlings by blue light was studied with marking techniques and with a high-resolution, growth-measuring apparatus. Blue light rapidly suppresses growth in a variety of cultivated species. In some species, the inhibition persists only during the period of irradiation, after which time growth quickly returns to the high dark rate, whereas, in other species, the light response has an additional long-term component which lasts for at least several hours in the dark. The long-term inhibition may be mediated by phytochrome, whereas the rapid, short-term component is specific to a blue-light receptor.The rapid inhibition of growth in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) requires high-energy blue irradiation, which is perceived directly by the growing region of the hypocotyl and inhibits all regions below the hook to the same extent. Detailed investigation of the kinetics of the inhibition in cucumber and in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) shows that, after a short lag period (20 to 30 seconds in cucumber, 60 to 70 seconds in sunflower), the growth rate declines in an exponential fashion to a lower rate, with a half-time of 15 to 25 seconds in cucumber and 90 to 150 seconds in sunflower. Excision of the hypocotyl greatly reduces the sensitivity of the growth rate to blue-light inhibition. Because of the rapid kinetics, the blue-light photoreceptor cannot affect cell enlargement by altering the supply of growth hormone or the sensitivity to hormones but probably operates more directly either on the biochemical process which loosens cell walls or on cell turgor.

Citing Articles

Morpho-physio-biochemical, molecular, and phytoremedial responses of plants to red, blue, and green light: a review.

Rehman M, Pan J, Mubeen S, Ma W, Luo D, Cao S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024; 31(14):20772-20791.

PMID: 38393568 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-32532-6.


Morphological and Photosynthetic Parameters of Green and Red Kale Microgreens Cultivated under Different Light Spectra.

Fraszczak B, Kula-Maximenko M, Podsedek A, Sosnowska D, Unegbu K, Spizewski T Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(22).

PMID: 38005697 PMC: 10674929. DOI: 10.3390/plants12223800.


Responses of butter leaf lettuce to mixed red and blue light with extended light/dark cycle period.

Chen X, Li Y, Wang L, Yang Q, Guo W Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6924.

PMID: 35484294 PMC: 9051091. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10681-3.


Building an extensible cell wall.

Cosgrove D Plant Physiol. 2022; 189(3):1246-1277.

PMID: 35460252 PMC: 9237729. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac184.


Red and blue wavelengths affect the morphology, energy use efficiency and nutritional content of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.).

Chen X, Li Y, Wang L, Guo W Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):8374.

PMID: 33864002 PMC: 8052440. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87911-7.


References
1.
Lockhart J . Studies on the Mechanism of Stem Growth Inhibition by Visible Radiation. Plant Physiol. 1959; 34(4):457-60. PMC: 541229. DOI: 10.1104/pp.34.4.457. View

2.
Poff K, Norris K . Four low-cost monochromatic sources of known equal intensities. Plant Physiol. 1967; 42(8):1155-7. PMC: 1086689. DOI: 10.1104/pp.42.8.1155. View

3.
Russell D, Galston A . Blockage by gibberellic Acid of phytochrome effects on growth, auxin responses, and flavonoid synthesis in etiolated pea internodes. Plant Physiol. 1969; 44(9):1211-6. PMC: 396246. DOI: 10.1104/pp.44.9.1211. View

4.
Muir R, Chang K . Effect of red light on coleoptile growth. Plant Physiol. 1974; 54(3):286-8. PMC: 367398. DOI: 10.1104/pp.54.3.286. View

5.
Green P, Cummins W . Growth rate and turgor pressure: auxin effect studies with an automated apparatus for single coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 1974; 54(6):863-9. PMC: 366624. DOI: 10.1104/pp.54.6.863. View