Single-step EUS-guided Transmural Drainage of Simple and Complicated Pancreatic Pseudocysts
Overview
Pharmacology
Radiology
Affiliations
Background: Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of pseudocysts has been reported, but there are no published prospective studies on clinical outcomes.
Objective: To assess the safety and the efficacy of single-step EUS-guided placement of large endoprostheses to treat simple and complicated pseudocysts.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Single tertiary referral center.
Patients: Consecutive patients referred for management of symptomatic chronic pancreatic pseudocysts >4 cm in size.
Interventions: Single-step EUS-guided transmural pseudocyst drainage performed with a linear-array echoendoscope for placement of 10F stents in adults and 7F stents in children.
Main Outcome Measures: Complete or partial (>50% reduction) resolution of pseudocyst on follow-up imaging, recurrence, clinical response, and procedure-related complications. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of a pancreatic pseudocyst in the same location.
Results: There were 33 patients, with a mean age of 43 years. Median pseudocyst size was 8.5 cm (range, 4-20 cm). Fourteen patients (42%) had infected pseudocysts, 8 patients (24%) had gastric varices, and 16 patients (48%) had no visible endoscopic bulge. Stent placement was successful in 31 patients (94%). Twenty-seven patients (82%) had complete resolution of a pseudocyst; 4 patients (12%) had partial resolution, with symptom relief. There were 2 major complications and 3 minor complications. Recurrence of a pseudocyst was observed in only 1 patient over a median follow-up of 46 weeks.
Limitations: No randomized treatment arm comparing this technique with conventional endoscopic drainage.
Conclusions: Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage with large endoprostheses is a safe and effective therapy for patients with simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts.
Pasqualetto A, Boroni G, Moneghini D, Parolini F, Orizio P, Bulotta A Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).
PMID: 38929223 PMC: 11202220. DOI: 10.3390/children11060643.
Shamah S, Sahakian A, Chapman C, Buxbaum J, Muniraj T, Aslanian H Endosc Ultrasound. 2022; 11(1):53-58.
PMID: 35102901 PMC: 8887040. DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00030.
Splenic injury following endoscopic drainage of a large pancreatic pseudocyst: a case report.
Supapannachart K, Funk C, Gensler L, Butters M J Med Case Rep. 2021; 15(1):409.
PMID: 34391461 PMC: 8364695. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-021-03004-z.
Ortizo R, Jalali F, Thieu D, Yu A, Bucayu R, Paiji C Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8(9):E1156-E1160.
PMID: 32904832 PMC: 7458734. DOI: 10.1055/a-1178-0185.
Mimery A, Pham M, Low W, Das A, Rajkomar K Cureus. 2020; 12(3):e7236.
PMID: 32190530 PMC: 7067370. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7236.