» Articles » PMID: 16650541

Single-step EUS-guided Transmural Drainage of Simple and Complicated Pancreatic Pseudocysts

Overview
Date 2006 May 3
PMID 16650541
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of pseudocysts has been reported, but there are no published prospective studies on clinical outcomes.

Objective: To assess the safety and the efficacy of single-step EUS-guided placement of large endoprostheses to treat simple and complicated pseudocysts.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Single tertiary referral center.

Patients: Consecutive patients referred for management of symptomatic chronic pancreatic pseudocysts >4 cm in size.

Interventions: Single-step EUS-guided transmural pseudocyst drainage performed with a linear-array echoendoscope for placement of 10F stents in adults and 7F stents in children.

Main Outcome Measures: Complete or partial (>50% reduction) resolution of pseudocyst on follow-up imaging, recurrence, clinical response, and procedure-related complications. Recurrence was defined as the reappearance of a pancreatic pseudocyst in the same location.

Results: There were 33 patients, with a mean age of 43 years. Median pseudocyst size was 8.5 cm (range, 4-20 cm). Fourteen patients (42%) had infected pseudocysts, 8 patients (24%) had gastric varices, and 16 patients (48%) had no visible endoscopic bulge. Stent placement was successful in 31 patients (94%). Twenty-seven patients (82%) had complete resolution of a pseudocyst; 4 patients (12%) had partial resolution, with symptom relief. There were 2 major complications and 3 minor complications. Recurrence of a pseudocyst was observed in only 1 patient over a median follow-up of 46 weeks.

Limitations: No randomized treatment arm comparing this technique with conventional endoscopic drainage.

Conclusions: Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage with large endoprostheses is a safe and effective therapy for patients with simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts.

Citing Articles

Single Center Experience of Eus-Guided Cystogastrostomy and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) Positioning in Children with Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Case Series.

Pasqualetto A, Boroni G, Moneghini D, Parolini F, Orizio P, Bulotta A Children (Basel). 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38929223 PMC: 11202220. DOI: 10.3390/children11060643.


Double pigtail stent placement as an adjunct to lumen-apposing metal stentsfor drainage of pancreatic fluid collections may not affect outcomes: A multicenter experience.

Shamah S, Sahakian A, Chapman C, Buxbaum J, Muniraj T, Aslanian H Endosc Ultrasound. 2022; 11(1):53-58.

PMID: 35102901 PMC: 8887040. DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-21-00030.


Splenic injury following endoscopic drainage of a large pancreatic pseudocyst: a case report.

Supapannachart K, Funk C, Gensler L, Butters M J Med Case Rep. 2021; 15(1):409.

PMID: 34391461 PMC: 8364695. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-021-03004-z.


Single-center experience demonstrating low adverse events and high efficacy with self-expandable metal esophageal and biliary stents for pseudocyst and walled off necrosis drainage.

Ortizo R, Jalali F, Thieu D, Yu A, Bucayu R, Paiji C Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8(9):E1156-E1160.

PMID: 32904832 PMC: 7458734. DOI: 10.1055/a-1178-0185.


The Management of an Intraperitoneal Leak Following Transgastric Stenting of a Pancreatic Pseudocyst.

Mimery A, Pham M, Low W, Das A, Rajkomar K Cureus. 2020; 12(3):e7236.

PMID: 32190530 PMC: 7067370. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7236.