» Articles » PMID: 16640320

The Role of Monitored Natural Recovery in Sediment Remediation

Overview
Date 2006 Apr 28
PMID 16640320
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The long-term goal of monitored natural recovery (MNR) is to achieve ecological recovery of biological endpoints in order to protect human and ecological health. Insofar as ecological recovery is affected by surface-sediment-contaminant concentrations, the primary recovery processes for MNR are natural sediment burial and contaminant transformation and weathering to less toxic forms. This paper discusses the overall approach for effective implementation of MNR for contaminated sediment sites. Several lines of evidence that may be used to demonstrate natural recovery processes are summarized, including documentation of source control; evidence of contaminant burial; measurement of surface sediment mixing depths and the active sediment benthic layer; measurement of sediment stability; contaminant transformation and weathering; modeling sediment transport, contaminant transport, and ecological recovery; measuring ecological recovery and long-term risk reduction; knowledge of future plans for use and development of the site; and watershed and institutional controls. In general, some form of natural recovery is expected and should be included as part of a remedy at virtually all contaminated sediment sites. Further, MNR investigations and an understanding of natural recovery processes provide cost-effective information and support the evaluation of more aggressive remedies such as capping, dredging, and the use of novel amendments. The risk of dredging or capping may be greater than the risk of leaving sediments in place at sites where capping or dredging offer little long-term environmental gain but pose significant short-term risks for workers, local communities, and the environment.

Citing Articles

Passive Sampling-Based versus Conventional-Based Metrics for Evaluating Remediation Efficacy at Contaminated Sediment Sites: A Review.

Grundy J, Lambert M, Burgess R Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(28):10151-10172.

PMID: 37364241 PMC: 10404352. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00232.


Limited Effectiveness of Carbonaceous Sorbents in Sequestering Aged Organic Contaminants in Sediments.

Taylor A, Wang J, Kaur P, Schlenk D, Gan J Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 57(25):9385-9393.

PMID: 37318754 PMC: 10308819. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02309.


Using Fish as a Sentinel in Risk Management of Contaminated Sediments.

Karlsson O, Waldetoft H, Hallen J, Malmaeus J, Stromberg L Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2022; 84(1):45-72.

PMID: 36543897 PMC: 9834368. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-022-00968-x.


Assessment of Biological Contribution to Natural Recovery of Anthropized Freshwater Sediments From Argentina: Autochthonous Microbiome Structure and Functional Prediction.

Madueno L, Starevich V, Agnello A, Coppotelli B, Laprida C, Vidal N Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:601705.

PMID: 33897628 PMC: 8059475. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.601705.


Tissue Distribution and Immunomodulation in Channel Catfish () Following Dietary Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyl Aroclors and Food Deprivation.

White S, DeMario D, Iwanowicz L, Blazer V, Wagner T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4).

PMID: 32075001 PMC: 7068257. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041228.