» Articles » PMID: 16635996

Determination of Optimal Atrioventricular Delay for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Acute Non-invasive Blood Pressure

Overview
Journal Europace
Date 2006 Apr 26
PMID 16635996
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: In this study, we apply non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring, by continuous finger photoplethysmography (Finometer), to detect directly haemodynamic responses during adjustment of the atrioventricular (AV) delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), at different heart rates.

Methods And Results: Twelve patients were studied with six re-attending for reproducibility assessment. At each AV delay, systolic BP relative to a reference AV delay of 120 ms (SBPrel) was calculated. We found that at higher heart rates, altering the AV delay had a more pronounced effect on BP (average range of SBPrel=17.4 mmHg) compared with resting rates (average range of SBPrel=6.5 mmHg), P<0.0001. Secondly, peak AV delay differed between patients (minimum 120 ms, maximum 200 ms). Thirdly, small changes in AV delay had significant BP effects: programming AV delay 40 ms below the peak AV delay reduced SBPrel by 4.9 mmHg (P<0.003); having it 40 ms above the peak decreased SBPrel by 4.4 mmHg (P<0.0005). Finally, the peak AV delay is highly reproducible both on the same day and at 3 months (Bland-Altman difference: 3+/-8 ms).

Conclusions: Continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring demonstrates that even small changes in AV delay from its haemodynamic peak value have a significant effect on BP. This peak varies between individuals, is highly reproducible, and is more pronounced at higher heart rates than resting rates.

Citing Articles

Central venous pressure as a method of optimising atrio-ventricular delay after cardiac surgery.

Tindale A, Cretu I, Gomez N, Haynes R, Meng H, Mason M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0310905.

PMID: 39823433 PMC: 11741378. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310905.


Optimizing outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy: what do recent data and insights say?.

de Vere F, Wijesuriya N, Howell S, Elliott M, Mehta V, Mannakkara N Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2024; 1-18.

PMID: 39695920 PMC: 11716670. DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2024.2445246.


Therapeutic potential of conduction system pacing as a method for improving cardiac output during ventricular tachycardia.

Keene D, Miyazawa A, Arnold A, Naraen A, Kaza N, Mohal J J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024; 67(7):1603-1613.

PMID: 38649588 PMC: 11522067. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01809-8.


A comparison of different methods to maximise signal extraction when using central venous pressure to optimise atrioventricular delay after cardiac surgery.

Cretu I, Tindale A, Abbod M, Balachandran W, Khir A, Meng H Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 51:101382.

PMID: 38496260 PMC: 10944103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101382.


Left bundle branch pacing with and without anodal capture: impact on ventricular activation pattern and acute haemodynamics.

Ali N, Saqi K, Arnold A, Miyazawa A, Keene D, Chow J Europace. 2023; 25(10).

PMID: 37815462 PMC: 10563660. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad264.