» Articles » PMID: 16635636

Prosthetic Intervention Effects on Activity of Lower-extremity Amputees

Overview
Date 2006 Apr 26
PMID 16635636
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of prosthetic interventions on the functional mobility of lower-extremity amputees.

Design: Crossover with repeated measures.

Setting: Household and community environment.

Participants: Twelve transtibial and 5 transfemoral amputees.

Interventions: For transtibial amputees, shock-absorbing versus rigid pylons. For transfemoral amputees, C-Leg versus Mauch SNS knees.

Main Outcome Measures: Daily activity level (step count) and duration (minutes of activity).

Results: Pylon type had no effect on the daily activity level or duration of transtibial amputees. Knee type had no effect on the daily activity level or duration of transfemoral amputees. Transtibial amputees were more active on weekdays (3079+/-1515 steps/d) than weekends (2386+/-1225 steps/d) (P=.007). In general, lower-extremity amputees perform numerous short-duration bouts of activity (1-2 min) consisting of fewer than 17 steps/min, but activities of more than 15 minutes in duration were relatively rare (<1 per day).

Conclusions: Intervention had no effect on amputee activity level and duration. Higher weekday activity levels of transtibial amputees suggest their vocational activities are more demanding than recreational activities. The fitting, alignment, and design of prosthetic components should be optimized for 1 to 2 minute bouts of activity consisting of only a few dozen steps.

Citing Articles

Self-Reinforced Composite Materials: Frictional Analysis and Its Implications for Prosthetic Socket Design.

Nagarajan Y, Hewavidana Y, Demirci E, Sun Y, Farukh F, Kandan K Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597452 PMC: 11595721. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225629.


Future Directions in Prosthetic Component Research and Clinical Prescription: A Precision Rehabilitation and Patient-Centered Care Approach.

Morgenroth D, Halsne E, Henderson A, Norvell D Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024; 105(12):2396-2399.

PMID: 39241852 PMC: 11869901. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.016.


A dataset of optical camera and IMU sensor derived kinematics of thirty transtibial prosthesis wearers.

Samala M, Rattanakoch J, Guerra G, Tharawadeepimuk K, Nanbancha A, Niamsang W Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):922.

PMID: 39181912 PMC: 11344789. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03677-3.


Sagittal and transverse ankle angle coupling can influence prosthetic socket transverse plane moments.

Klute G, Mulcahy C Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1354144.

PMID: 38638287 PMC: 11024427. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1354144.


Walking speeds are lower for short distance and turning locomotion: Experiments and modeling in low-cost prosthesis users.

Seethapathi N, Jain A, Srinivasan M PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0295993.

PMID: 38166012 PMC: 10760709. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295993.