» Articles » PMID: 16635588

Volatile Biomarkers of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the Breath

Overview
Date 2006 Apr 26
PMID 16635588
Citations 87
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulmonary tuberculosis may alter volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath because Mycobacteria and oxidative stress resulting from Mycobacterial infection both generate distinctive VOCs. The objective of this study was to determine if breath VOCs contain biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Head space VOCs from cultured Mycobacterium tuberculosis were captured on sorbent traps and assayed by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS). One hundred and thirty different VOCs were consistently detected. The most abundant were naphthalene, 1-methyl-, 3-heptanone, methylcyclododecane, heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-, benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, and cyclohexane, 1,4-dimethyl-. Breath VOCs were assayed by GC/MS in 42 patients hospitalized for suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis and in 59 healthy controls. Sputum cultures were positive for Mycobacteria in 23/42 and negative in19/42 patients. Breath markers of oxidative stress were increased in all hospitalized patients (p<0.04). Pattern recognition analysis and fuzzy logic analysis of breath VOCs independently distinguished healthy controls from hospitalized patients with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Fuzzy logic analysis identified patients with positive sputum cultures with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95.7% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity on leave-one-out cross-validation); breath VOC markers were similar to those observed in vitro, including naphthalene, 1-methyl- and cyclohexane, 1,4-dimethyl-. Pattern recognition analysis identified patients with positive sputum cultures with 82.6% sensitivity (19/23) and 100% specificity (18/18), employing 12 principal components from 134 breath VOCs. We conclude that volatile biomarkers in breath were sensitive and specific for pulmonary tuberculosis: the breath test distinguished between "sick versus well" i.e. between normal controls and patients hospitalized for suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis, and between infected versus non-infected patients i.e. between those whose sputum cultures were positive or negative for Mycobacteria.

Citing Articles

New volatile organic compounds from the exhaled breath of active tuberculosis patients.

Mpolokang A, Setlhare T, Bhattacharyya S, Chimowa G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5197.

PMID: 39939674 PMC: 11821842. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89178-8.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Breath Tests to Detect Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review.

Chew N, Yun S, See K Lung. 2025; 203(1):26.

PMID: 39841224 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-024-00779-y.


Detection of subsp. in Australian Cattle and Sheep by Analysing Volatile Organic Compounds in Faeces.

Hodgeman R, Krill C, Rochfort S, Rodoni B Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39685980 PMC: 11644260. DOI: 10.3390/s24237443.


Non-sputum-based samples and biomarkers for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: the hope to improve childhood and HIV-associated tuberculosis diagnosis.

Kasule G, Hermans S, Semugenze D, Wekiya E, Nsubuga J, Mwachan P Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):502.

PMID: 39420420 PMC: 11487833. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02092-z.


Partial role of volatile organic compounds in behavioural responses of mice to bedding from cancer-affected congeners.

Gouzerh F, Dormont L, Buatois B, Herve M, Mancini M, Maraver A Biol Open. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 39351636 PMC: 11552615. DOI: 10.1242/bio.060324.