» Articles » PMID: 16635566

Evaluating the Pharmacoeconomic Effect of Adding Tiotropium Bromide to the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients in Singapore

Overview
Journal Respir Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2006 Apr 26
PMID 16635566
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis on the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with the addition of tiotropium bromide.

Methods: Pharmacoeconomic modeling was performed utilizing the efficacy of tiotropium bromide from the literature on different settings and severity of COPD. Reductions in exacerbations, hospitalizations, and number of exacerbation days per year were derived from these studies. Cost of drug treatment, exacerbations, hospitalization, and loss of income were derived from local data in Singapore and reported in Singapore dollars (US$1=S$1.71). A model was constructed to calculate the impact of one-year treatment with tiotropium bromide, and the results were reported for the total incremental cost per year, cost per year needed to reduce one hospitalization in one year, and cost-savings from hospitalizations in one year. Sensitivity analysis were performed for different number of patients treated per year, differing cost of hospitalization, different cost for tiotropium bromide, different impact of tiotropium bromide on clinical outcomes, and the different amount of substitution drug utilized in the comparator group.

Results: Using the different clinical effects and looking at the impact on treating 1000, 2000, and 10,000 patients per year, most of the results showed a high level of decrease in overall cost per year that ranged from S$145.40 to S$840.37 per patient treated. Cost per year needed to reduce one hospitalization in one year ranged from S$3217.31 to S$18,148.92. Cost-savings from hospitalizations in one year per patient treated ranged from $57.16 to $322.49. This may contribute as high as 83% of the overall cost saving. Sensitivity analysis supports the cost savings finding.

Conclusion: Adding tiotropium bromide for severe COPD patients would lead to a significant cost savings for the economy.

Citing Articles

Respiratory questionnaire-based analysis of awareness of COPD in a large multicenter rural population-based study in India.

Patil S, Patil R, Bhise M, Jadhav A Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2022; 8(4):322-330.

PMID: 36420173 PMC: 9676131. DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.47.


New clinical insights into chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and their implications for pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Mapel D, Roberts M Pharmacoeconomics. 2012; 30(10):869-85.

PMID: 22852587 PMC: 3625413. DOI: 10.2165/11633330-000000000-00000.


Cost effectiveness of pharmacological maintenance treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the evidence and methodological issues.

Molken M, Goossens L Pharmacoeconomics. 2012; 30(4):271-302.

PMID: 22409290 DOI: 10.2165/11589270-000000000-00000.


Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of tiotropium versus salmeterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Naik S, Kamal K, Keys P, Mattei T Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011; 2:25-36.

PMID: 21935312 PMC: 3169962.


Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of tiotropium bromide in the long-term treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Italy.

Zaniolo O, Iannazzo S, Pradelli L, Miravitlles M Eur J Health Econ. 2010; 13(1):71-80.

PMID: 21086017 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-010-0285-8.